Literature DB >> 9467213

Physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water method.

K R Westerterp1, C V Bouten.   

Abstract

The doubly labeled water method for the measurement of average daily metabolic rate (ADMR), combined with a measurement of resting metabolic rate, permits the calculation of energy expenditure for physical activity under normal daily living conditions. This procedure was used to evaluate the use of movement registration for physical activity assessment under daily living conditions. Subjects were 16 men and 14 women with normal weight (body mass index (BMI) 24.6 +/- 2.4 kg/m2). Their body movement was registered with a triaxial accelerometer over a 7-day interval, simultaneous with an ADMR measurement with a doubly labeled water method. Resting metabolic rate was measured overnight in a respiration chamber (sleeping metabolic rate (SMR)) at the start of the ADMR measurement. Subjects did wear the accelerometer during waking hours. Accelerometer output (AO, counts/min) was related to physical activity as quantified by adjustment of ADMR for SMR. Additional studies were performed in 11 subjects with anorexia nervosa (BMI 16.7 +/- 1.7 kg/m2) and 8 subjects with morbid obesity (BMI 45.3 +/- 6.8 kg/m2). AO explained most of the variation in ADMR, after adjustment for SMR (R2 = 0.64, SEE = 0.9 MJ/d) Average AO was 1108 +/- 293, 1144 +/- 318, and 946 +/- 391 for subjects with normal weight, anorexia nervosa, and morbid obesity, respectively, and was not significantly different between the three groups. However, in the anorectics AO was significantly related to body mass index (r = 0.84, (p < 0.01), subjects with a BMI17 kg/m2 were equally or more active compared with control subjects, while subjects with a BMI < 17 kg/m2 were equally or less active compared with control subjects. In the morbid obese group, 5 of the 8 subjects had a low activity level (AO < 900 counts/day) and the other 3 had a high activity level (AO1150 counts/day). The triaxial accelerometer is an objective method that can be used to quantify physical activity related energy expenditure and to distinguish differences in activity levels between individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9467213     DOI: 10.1007/bf01617795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Ernahrungswiss        ISSN: 0044-264X


  15 in total

1.  The Caltrac accelerometer as a physical activity monitor for school-age children.

Authors:  J F Sallis; M J Buono; J J Roby; D Carlson; J A Nelson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water.

Authors:  C V Bouten; W P Verboeket-van de Venne; K R Westerterp; M Verduin; J D Janssen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1996-08

3.  Body mass index and daily physical activity in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  C V Bouten; W D van Marken Lichtenbelt; K R Westerterp
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Energy expenditure and physical activity in subjects consuming full-or reduced-fat products as part of their normal diet.

Authors:  K R Westerterp; W P Verboeket-van de Venne; C V Bouten; C de Graaf; K H van het Hof; J A Weststrate
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  The assessment of children's physical activity: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  L M Klesges; R C Klesges
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1985

7.  Determinants of total daily energy expenditure: variability in physical activity.

Authors:  R Rising; I T Harper; A M Fontvielle; R T Ferraro; M Spraul; E Ravussin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Determinants of weight loss after vertical banded gastroplasty.

Authors:  K R Westerterp; W H Saris; P B Soeters; F ten Hoor
Journal:  Int J Obes       Date:  1991-08

9.  Energy equivalents of CO2 and their importance in assessing energy expenditure when using tracer techniques.

Authors:  M Elia
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1991-01

10.  Field trial of a three-dimensional activity monitor: comparison with self report.

Authors:  C E Matthews; P S Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Physical Activity Capture Technology With Potential for Incorporation Into Closed-Loop Control for Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Vikash Dadlani; James A Levine; Shelly K McCrady-Spitzer; Eyal Dassau; Yogish C Kudva
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-18

Review 2.  Estimating human energy expenditure: a review of techniques with particular reference to doubly labelled water.

Authors:  Philip Ainslie; Thomas Reilly; Klass Westerterp
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Measurement of daily activity in restrictive type anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Ann M Harris; Donald E McAlpine; Rashmi Shirbhate; Chinmay U Manohar; James A Levine
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Seasonal changes in amount and patterns of physical activity in women.

Authors:  Maciej S Buchowski; Leena Choi; Karen M Majchrzak; Sari Acra; Charles E Mathews; Kong Y Chen
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2009-03

5.  An Under-the-Table Leg-Movement Apparatus and Changes in Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Gabriel A Koepp; Graham Moore; James A Levine
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.