Literature DB >> 3683156

The assessment of children's physical activity: a comparison of methods.

L M Klesges1, R C Klesges.   

Abstract

The authors assessed the convergent validity and the sources of error in an electronic single-plane accelerometer (i.e., Caltrac Personal Activity Computer (Hemokinetics, Inc., Vienna, VA). The device was validated against observed all-day physical activity levels of children in their natural environment. Thirty pre-school children were observed in non-structured activity for periods of approximately 9 h while wearing the accelerometer. The results revealed moderately high but variable Spearman rank-order correlations between hourly readings of the accelerometer and the observational system (range of correlations = 0.62 to 0.95). An all-day accelerometer reading significantly correlated with the observational instrument (rho = 0.54). A step-wise regression analysis revealed that the best behavioral predictor of the all-day accelerometer reading was the observed behavior of walking, explaining 32% of the total variance. Older vs younger children (i.e., greater than 32.5 months), females vs males, and overweight (i.e., 75 percentile or greater) vs normal weight children tended to show higher correlations between direct observation and accelerometer readings. Implications of these findings and the utilization of the accelerometer in epidemiologic research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3683156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents.

Authors:  J R Sirard; R R Pate
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Bias in estimating caloric expenditure from physical activity in children. Implications for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  J F Sallis; M J Buono; P S Freedson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Ambulatory activity monitoring in youth: state of the science.

Authors:  Kristie F Bjornson; Basia Belza
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.049

Review 4.  Effectiveness of training programmes for prepubescent children.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  K R Westerterp; C V Bouten
Journal:  Z Ernahrungswiss       Date:  1997-12

6.  Validity and reliability of physical activity measures in greek high school age children.

Authors:  Eugenia C Argiropoulou; Maria Michalopoulou; Nikolaos Aggeloussis; Andreas Avgerinos
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Assessment of 24-hour physical behaviour in children and adolescents via wearables: a systematic review of free-living validation studies.

Authors:  Marco Giurgiu; Simon Kolb; Carina Nigg; Alexander Burchartz; Irina Timm; Marlissa Becker; Ellen Rulf; Ann-Kathrin Doster; Elena Koch; Johannes B J Bussmann; Claudio Nigg; Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer; Alexander Woll
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-05-12

Review 8.  Physical activity in preschoolers: understanding prevalence and measurement issues.

Authors:  Melody Oliver; Grant M Schofield; Gregory S Kolt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Systematic review of accelerometer-based methods for 24-h physical behavior assessment in young children (0-5 years old).

Authors:  Annelinde Lettink; Teatske M Altenburg; Jelle Arts; Vincent T van Hees; Mai J M Chinapaw
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 8.915

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.