Literature DB >> 9464894

Development validation and problems with the toxic equivalency factor approach for risk assessment of dioxins and related compounds.

S H Safe1.   

Abstract

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), dibenzofurans (PCDF), and biphenyls (PCB) are industrial compounds or by-products that have been widely identified as environmental contaminants, and residues have been detected in fish, wildlife, and humans. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD; dioxin) is the most toxic member of this class of halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAH); mechanistic studies indicate that the toxic and biochemical effects associated with exposure to TCDD are mediated via initial binding to the cytosolic aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor protein present in target tissues and organs. Several other 2,3,7, 8-substituted PCDD and PCDF and non-ortho substituted PCB also bind to the Ah receptor and induce toxic responses similar to those for TCDD. Moreover, for these HAH there is a rank order correlation between their structure-Ah receptor binding and structure-toxicity relationships, and this supports a role for the Ah receptor in mediating these responses. Thus, the toxic equivalency factor (TEF) approach for HAH is based on the common mechanism of action for TCDD and related compounds in which a TEF value for a "dioxin-like" congener is defined as the potency of the individual (i) congener relative to TCDD ([EC50 [TCDD]/EC50 [test compound]). The toxic or dioxin equivalent (TEQ) for a mixture of HAH is defined by the following equation: TEQ = sigma [PCDDi] x TEFi + sigma [PCDFi] x TEFi. Industrial emissions and environmental and food residues contain complex mixtures of HAH (exodioxins) and the TEF/TEQ approach is used to regulate emissions and estimate the potential exposure and possible adverse health effects of exodioxins. The TEF approach for risk assessment of exodioxins makes a number of assumptions, including response additivity for individual compounds in a mixture of HAH. This review documents some of the following problems and limitations of the TEF approach: 1) environmental and food residues of HAH contain "non-dioxin-like" PCB that exhibit "antidioxin" activity for some responses; 2) the human diet contains endogenous Ah receptor ligands (endodioxins) such as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), aromatic amines in cooked foods, indole-3-carbinol (I3C), and related hetero-PAH in cruciferous vegetables. Mass balance and mass potency estimates for human dietary intakes suggest that for some responses the effects of natural or endodioxins may be greater than those of exodioxins; and 3) I3C, a weak Ah receptor agonist, also exhibits Ah receptor antagonist activity, and interactions between I3C and endodioxins may inhibit or inactivate some toxic responses and decrease TEQ(Exodioxin).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9464894     DOI: 10.2527/1998.761134x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  25 in total

Review 1.  Ah receptor ligands and their impacts on gut resilience: structure-activity effects.

Authors:  Stephen Safe; Arul Jayaraman; Robert S Chapkin
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Isotope-labeled immunoassays without radiation waste.

Authors:  G Shan; W Huang; S J Gee; B A Buchholz; J S Vogel; B D Hammock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Advances in analytical techniques for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxin-like PCBs.

Authors:  Eric J Reiner; Ray E Clement; Allan B Okey; Chris H Marvin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 4.  An overview of the effects of dioxins and dioxin-like compounds on vertebrates, as documented in human and ecological epidemiology.

Authors:  Sally S White; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Linking empirical estimates of body burden of environmental chemicals and wellness using NHANES data.

Authors:  Chris Gennings; Rhonda Ellis; Joseph K Ritter
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  In vitro tools for the toxicological evaluation of sediments and dredged materials: intra- and inter-laboratory comparisons of chemical and bioanalytical methods.

Authors:  Kathrin Eichbaum; Markus Brinkmann; Leonie Nuesser; Carolin Gembé; Marina Ohlig; Sebastian Buchinger; Georg Reifferscheid; Markus Hecker; John P Giesy; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Dietary exposure and risk assessment of organochlorine pesticide residues in rural communities living within catchment areas of iSimangaliso World Heritage Site, South Africa.

Authors:  Archibold Buah-Kwofie; Marc S Humphries; Letitia Pillay
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Integrating data gap filling techniques: A case study predicting TEFs for neurotoxicity TEQs to facilitate the hazard assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Prachi Pradeep; Laura M Carlson; Richard Judson; Geniece M Lehmann; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  Direct assessment of cumulative aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist activity in sera from experimentally exposed mice and environmentally exposed humans.

Authors:  Jennifer J Schlezinger; Pamela L Bernard; Amelia Haas; Philippe Grandjean; Pal Weihe; David H Sherr
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.