Literature DB >> 9458011

Tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy versus tacrolimus in adult liver transplantation.

D E Eckhoff1, B M McGuire, L R Frenette, J L Contreras, S L Hudson, J S Bynon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) prolongs allograft survival in experimental animals, prevents acute rejection in humans, and has recently been approved for use in renal transplantation in combination with cyclosporine. Tacrolimus (Prograf) has been shown to be effective for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in liver transplantation. However, there has been limited experience with the combination of tacrolimus and MMF in liver transplantation.
METHODS: This retrospective pilot study examined the results in 130 primary, consecutive, adult liver transplants under two separate immunosuppressive protocols. Patients in the study group received MMF (1 g p.o. b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.), and a standard steroid taper. MMF was also tapered and then discontinued within 3 months of transplantation. A historical control received tacrolimus (0.15 mg/kg p.o. b.i.d.) and the same steroid taper.
RESULTS: Pretransplant demographics, including creatinine, were not significantly different between the groups. The 6-month patient and graft survivals of 96.3% (control) versus 92.0% (study) were not significantly different. The incidence of acute rejection was 45.0% in the control group versus 26.0% in the study group (P = 0.03). The study group had a lower incidence of rejection (mean episodes/patient +/- SEM): 0.28+/-0.07 vs. 0.61+/-0.10 (P = 0.007). All of the study group members responded to high-dose steroids. In the control group, three patients required monoclonal antibody therapy and two patients required the addition of MMF. The incidence of cytomegalovirus was similar in the study group and the control group (13.8% vs. 10.0%, P = NS). Early renal function was better preserved in the tacrolimus/MMF group (mean creatinine +/- SEM): 1.09 mg/dl +/- 0.05 vs. 1.51 mg/dl +/- 0.08 at 30 days, P = 0.0001. The study design required dosing with less tacrolimus (mean mg/day +/- SEM), which was achieved at 1 week (23.2+/-0.7 vs. 13.5+/-0.5); 1 month (18.7+/-0.8 vs. 11.4+/-0.5); 3 months (14.5+/-0.6 vs. 9+/-0.5); and 6 months (11.6+/-0.6 vs. 8.2+/-0.6); P = 0.0001, for all time points.
CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with tacrolimus and MMF may significantly reduce the incidence of acute liver allograft rejection, allow a significant reduction in tacrolimus dosage, and decrease the incidence of nephrotoxicity. Long-term analysis will be necessary to assess any increased risk of opportunistic infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9458011     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199801270-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical mycophenolic acid monitoring in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Bing Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Efficacy of mycofenolate mofetil for steroid-resistant acute rejection after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Sumihito Tamura; Yuichi Matsui; Junichi Kaneko; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.

Authors:  G L Plosker; R H Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Options for induction immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michael A J Moser
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Immunosuppressive drugs in paediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  I D van Mourik; D A Kelly
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  Single-agent immunosuppression after liver transplantation: what is possible?

Authors:  Maria L Raimondo; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Profile of health-related quality of life outcomes after liver transplantation: univariate effects and multivariate models.

Authors:  R T Russell; I D Feurer; P Wisawatapnimit; E S Lillie; E T Castaldo; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Tacrolimus-related adverse effects in liver transplant recipients: its association with trough concentrations.

Authors:  Joy Varghese; Mettu Srinivasa Reddy; Kota Venugopal; Rajasekhar Perumalla; Gomathy Narasimhan; Olithselvan Arikichenin; Vivekanandan Shanmugam; Naresh Shanmugam; Vijaya Srinivasan; Venkataraman Jayanthi; Mohamed Rela
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-18

Review 10.  Pediatric liver transplantation.

Authors:  Marco Spada; Silvia Riva; Giuseppe Maggiore; Davide Cintorino; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.