Literature DB >> 18695756

Profile of health-related quality of life outcomes after liver transplantation: univariate effects and multivariate models.

R T Russell1, I D Feurer, P Wisawatapnimit, E S Lillie, E T Castaldo, C Wright Pinson.   

Abstract

AIM: To test the effects of pre- and post-transplant clinical covariates on post-transplant health-related quality of life (HRQOL) score profiles in liver transplant recipients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: HRQOL was measured before and after transplantation using the SF-36 Health Survey. Clinical data [diagnosis, model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, post-transplant rejection and infection episodes], pre-transplant functional performance (FP), and demographics were collected. Multivariate models for the eight SF-36 scales and two summary components were developed using multiple regression. Discriminant analysis was used to test whether the score profiles differentiated among recipients with and without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.
RESULTS: 104 adults reported pre- and post-transplant HRQOL. Time post-transplant averaged 9+/-8 months (range 1-39). Scores on all SF-36 measures improved from pre- to post-transplant (p<0.001), and 7 of 10 models were significant (p<0.05). After controlling for pre-transplant HRQOL and time post-transplant, HCV infection had a negative effect on the role physical, bodily pain, and role emotional scales. History of a rejection episode had a negative effect on the bodily pain and vitality scales. MELD scores > or = 18 had a positive effect on the role physical scale. Pre-transplant FP and post-transplant infection episodes did not affect post-transplant HRQOL. HCV infection had a significant effect on the SF-36 score profile (canonical correlation=0.50; p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-transplant HCV infection, MELD score, and post-transplant rejection episodes have significant independent effects on HRQOL after liver transplantation. Their specific effects vary among the individual SF-36 scales, and HRQOL score profiles differ among HCV+ and HCV- recipients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graft rejection; HCV; MELD; liver transplantation; quality of life; score profile

Year:  2008        PMID: 18695756      PMCID: PMC2504851          DOI: 10.1080/13651820701883106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  21 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D M Bravata; I Olkin; A E Barnato; E B Keeffe; D K Owens
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1999-07

2.  Health-related quality of life after liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Hellgren; B Berglund; U Gunnarsson; K Hansson; U Norberg; L Bäckman
Journal:  Liver Transpl Surg       Date:  1998-05

3.  Outcomes analysis in 100 liver transplantation patients.

Authors:  S K Geevarghese; A E Bradley; J K Wright; W C Chapman; I Feurer; J L Payne; E B Hunter; C W Pinson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Investigation of the Karnofsky Performance Status as a measure of quality of life.

Authors:  A Grieco; C J Long
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Effects of hepatitis C virus infection and its recurrence after liver transplantation on functional performance and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Irene D Feurer; J Kelly Wright; Jerita L Payne; Adriana C Kain; Paul E Wise; Pamela Hale; William C Chapman; Theodore Speroff; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  MELD fails to measure quality of life in liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Sammy Saab; Ayman B Ibrahim; Alexander Shpaner; Zobair M Younossi; Cindy Lee; Francisco Durazo; Steven Han; Karl Esrason; Victor Wu; Jonathan Hiatt; Douglas G Farmer; R Mark Ghobrial; Curtis Holt; Hasan Yersiz; Leonard I Goldstein; Myron J Tong; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  The relevance of anxiety, depression, and coping in patients after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ralf Nickel; Andreas Wunsch; Ulrich T Egle; Ansgar W Lohse; Gerd Otto
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with neoral or tacrolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  R A Fisher; J M Ham; A Marcos; M L Shiffman; V A Luketic; P M Kimball; A J Sanyal; L Wolfe; A Chodorov; M P Posner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Outcomes analysis for 50 liver transplant recipients: the Vanderbilt experience.

Authors:  J L Payne; K R McCarty; J G Drougas; W C Chapman; J K Wright; N Y Pinson; K E Beliles; V L Newsom; E B Hunter; D S Raiford; J A Awad; R F Burk; K L Donovan; D H Van Buren; C W Pinson
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  3 in total

1.  The current economic burden of cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guy W Neff; Christopher W Duncan; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-10

2.  Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Matthew Walton; Ros Wade; Lindsay Claxton; Sahar Sharif-Hurst; Melissa Harden; Jai Patel; Ian Rowe; Robert Hodgson; Alison Eastwood
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Liver transplantation for hepatitis C and alcoholic liver disease.

Authors:  Marco Carbone; James Neuberger
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.