Literature DB >> 11985487

Options for induction immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients.

Michael A J Moser1.   

Abstract

Immunosuppression administered in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation plays a crucial role in the survival of the graft and the patient. The introduction of cyclosporin was an important landmark in transplantation, and to this day, calcineurin inhibitors form the basis of most induction immunosuppression regimens. New drugs are being developed which are more specifically targeted to prevention of rejection, and multiple drug combinations have been proposed as a means of reducing the adverse effects of individual drugs. Azathioprine and the newer antimetabolite mycophenolate mofetil have been added to calcineurin inhibitor-based regimens with varying amounts of success. Antibody induction has evolved as a potent form of immunosuppression as well as a means of avoiding certain adverse effects, particularly nephrotoxicity. The numerous adverse effects encountered with polyclonal preparations have been reduced with the development of more specific monoclonal antibodies such as muromonab CD3 (OKT3) or interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists. The anti-IL-2R antibody preparations basiliximab and daclizumab have shown excellent early results due to their potent yet highly targeted immunosuppressive effect and minimal adverse effects. Further study is needed to determine the most appropriate dosage, timing and patient population for these new drugs in the setting of liver transplantation. Although a number of different induction regimens have been described, no single protocol is suitable for all liver transplant recipients. Rather, certain regimens have advantages that could favour their use in a specific subgroup of patients. A number of clinical trials are underway to identify new, more specific drugs and combinations which could be useful in induction immunosuppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11985487     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200262070-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  69 in total

Review 1.  Daclizumab: a review of its use in the prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for immunosuppression and the outcome in elective transplants. European FK506 Liver Study Group.

Authors:  J Devlin; R Williams
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Comparison of tacrolimus with microemulsion cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation.

Authors:  X A Zervos; D Weppler; G P Fragulidis; M B Torres; J R Nery; M F Khan; A D Pinna; T Kato; J Miller; K R Reddy; A G Tzakis
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody prevents early rejection in liver transplantation--a pilot study.

Authors:  G Otto; J Thies; D Kabelitz; H Schlag; W J Hofmann; C Herfarth; S Meuer
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  An analysis of late deaths after liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Asfar; P Metrakos; J Fryer; D Verran; C Ghent; D Grant; M Bloch; P Burns; W Wall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A prospective randomized trial comparing interleukin-2 receptor antibody versus antithymocyte globulin as part of a quadruple immunosuppressive induction therapy following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  J M Langrehr; N C Nüssler; U Neumann; O Guckelberger; R Lohmann; A Radtke; S Jonas; J Klupp; T Steinmüller; H Lobeck; S Meuer; H Schlag; H P Lemmens; M Knoop; H Keck; W O Bechstein; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  A pilot study on the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppression without prednisone after liver transplantation.

Authors:  G Tisone; M Angelico; G Palmieri; F Pisani; A Anselmo; L Baiocchi; S Negrini; G Orlando; G Vennarecci; C U Casciani
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C: outcome, effect of immunosuppression, and causes of retransplantation during an 8-year single-center experience.

Authors:  R M Ghobrial; D G Farmer; A Baquerizo; S Colquhoun; H R Rosen; H Yersiz; J F Markmann; K E Drazan; C Holt; D Imagawa; L I Goldstein; P Martin; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with neoral or tacrolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  R A Fisher; J M Ham; A Marcos; M L Shiffman; V A Luketic; P M Kimball; A J Sanyal; L Wolfe; A Chodorov; M P Posner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1998-12-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Reduction of acute renal allograft rejection by daclizumab. Daclizumab Double Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  B Nashan; S Light; I R Hardie; A Lin; J R Johnson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Barriers preventing liver transplantation in Canadians with HIV-infection--perceptions of HIV specialists.

Authors:  Curtis L Cooper; Joanne DeForest; John Gill; Richard Lalonde
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Daclizumab induction therapy in liver transplant recipients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  S K Asrani; W R Kim; R A Pedersen; M R Charlton; W K Kremers; T M Therneau; C B Rosen; P G Dean
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  A comprehensive review of immunosuppression used for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sandeep Mukherjee; Urmila Mukherjee
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2009-07-16

Review 4.  A benefit-risk assessment of basiliximab in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Romano Danesi; Fabio Vistoli; Marco Del Chiaro; Stefano Signori; Piero Marchetti; Mario Del Tacca; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibodies in transplantation: what is the basis for choice?

Authors:  Teun Van Gelder; Michiel Warlé; Rik G Ter Meulen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Immunosuppression strategies after liver transplantation: a single centre experience in 57 liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rajeev Sharma; M R Rajasekar; Arun Raghuvanshi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Antibody induction versus placebo, no induction, or another type of antibody induction for liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Luit Penninga; André Wettergren; Colin H Wilson; An-Wen Chan; Daniel A Steinbrüchel; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-05

8.  Role of basiliximab in the prevention of acute cellular rejection in adult to adult living-related liver transplantation: a single center experience.

Authors:  S Gruttadauria; L Mandalà; D Biondo; M Spampinato; V Lamonaca; R Volpes; G Vizzini; Jw Marsh; A Marcos; B Gridelli
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2007-03

Review 9.  Evolving concepts in the selection of immunosuppression regimen for liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Andrew L Singer
Journal:  Hepat Med       Date:  2011-05-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.