Literature DB >> 9455663

Do "whiplash injuries" occur in low-speed rear impacts?

W H Castro1, M Schilgen, S Meyer, M Weber, C Peuker, K Wörtler.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to find out whether in a rear-impact motor vehicle accident, velocity changes in the impact vehicle of between 10 and 15 km/h can cause so-called "whiplash injuries". An assessment of the actual injury mechanism of such whiplash injuries and comparison of vehicle rear-end collisions with amusement park bumper car collisions was also carried out. The study was based on experimental biochemical, kinematic, and clinical analysis with volunteers. In Europe between DM 10 and 20 billion each year is paid out by insurance companies alone for whiplash injuries, although various studies show that the biodynamic stresses arising in the case of slight to moderate vehicle damage may not be high enough to cause such injuries. Most of these experimental studies with cadavers, dummies, and some with volunteers were performed with velocity changes below 10 km/h. About 65% of the insurance claims, however, take place in cases with velocity changes of up to 15 km/h. Fourteen made volunteers (aged 28-47 years; average 33.2 years) and five female volunteers (aged 26-37 years; average 32.8 years) participated in 17 vehicle rear-end collisions and 3 bumper car collisions. All cars were fitted with normal European bumper systems. Before, 1 day after and 4-5 weeks after each vehicle crash test and in two of the three bumper car crash tests a clinical examination, a computerized motion analysis, and an MRI examination with Gd-DTPA of the cervical spine of the test persons were performed. During each crash test, in which the test persons were completely screened-off visually and acoustically, the muscle tension of various neck muscles was recorded by surface electromyography (EMG). The kinematic responses of the test persons and the forces occurring were measured by accelerometers. The kinematic analyses were performed with movement markers and a screening frequency of 700 Hz. To record the acceleration effects of the target vehicle and the bullet vehicle, vehicle accident data recorders were installed in both. The contact phase of the vehicle structures and the kinematics of the test persons were also recorded using high-speed cameras. The results showed that the range of velocity change (vehicle collisions) was 8.7-14.2 km/h (average 11.4 km/h) and the range of mean acceleration of the target vehicle was 2.1-3.6 g (average 2.7 g). The range of velocity change (bumper car collisions) was 8.3- 10.6 km/h (average 9.9 km/h) and the range of mean acceleration of the target bumper car was 1.8-2.6 g (average 2.2 g). No injury signs were found at the physical examinations, computerized motion analyses, or at the MRI examinations. Only one of the male volunteers suffered a reduction of rotation of the cervical spine to the left of 10 degrees for 10 weeks. The kinematic analysis very clearly showed that the whiplash mechanism consists of translation/extension (high energy) of the cervical spine with consecutive flexion (low energy) of the cervical spine: hyperextension of the cervical spine during the vehicle crashes was not observed. All the tests showed that the EMG signal of the neck muscles starts before the head movement takes place. The stresses recorded in the vehicle collisions were in the same range as those recorded in the bumper car crashes. From the extent of the damage to the vehicles after a collision it is possible to determine the level of the velocity change. The study concluded that, the "limit of harmlessness" for stresses arising from rear-end impacts with regard to the velocity changes lies between 10 and 15 km/h. For everyday practice, photographs of the damage to cars involved in a rear-end impact are essential to determine this velocity change. The stress occurring in vehicle rear-end collisions can be compared to the stress in bumper car collisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9455663      PMCID: PMC3467723          DOI: 10.1007/bf01834062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  3 in total

1.  Controlled automobile rearend collisions, an investigation of related engineering and medical phenomena.

Authors:  D M SEVERY; J H MATHEWSON; C O BECHTOL
Journal:  Can Serv Med J       Date:  1955-11

2.  Acceleration injury of the cervical spine by hypertranslation of the head. Part I. Effect of normal translation of the head on cervical spine motion: a radiological study.

Authors:  L Penning
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome: a critical review based on a methodological approach.

Authors:  L J Stovner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total
  22 in total

1.  Epidemiology of whiplash: an international dilemma.

Authors:  R Ferrari; A S Russell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Whiplash sine whiplash.

Authors:  Oliver Kwan; Jon Friel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The role of sternocleidomastoid muscle in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.

Authors:  Ivonne A Hernández; Ken R Fyfe; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Accident analysis and biomechanics: relevance of technical reports for the medical assessment of spinal injuries].

Authors:  M Weber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Whiplash injury following minor accidents: construct or serious injury?].

Authors:  F Schröter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  The nosological classification of whiplash-associated disorder: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joe H Ghorayeb
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2021-04

7.  Variability in the control of head movements in seated humans: a link with whiplash injuries?

Authors:  N Vibert; H G MacDougall; C de Waele; D P Gilchrist; A M Burgess; A Sidis; A Migliaccio; I S Curthoys; P P Vidal
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Head and neck control varies with perturbation acceleration but not jerk: implications for whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Gunter P Siegmund; Jean-Sébastien Blouin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Cervical muscle response to whiplash-type right anterolateral impacts.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Functional cervical MRI within the scope of whiplash injuries: presentation of a new motion device for the cervical spine.

Authors:  Klaus Birnbaum; Uwe Maus; Josef Tacke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.