Literature DB >> 15060820

Cervical muscle response to whiplash-type right anterolateral impacts.

Shrawan Kumar1, Robert Ferrari, Yogesh Narayan.   

Abstract

Frontal impacts are a common cause of whiplash injury. Yet, volunteer studies of the cervical muscular response and head-neck kinematics to frontal impacts are uncommon, and specifically, the effect of an offset (anterolateral) frontal impact on the resultant muscle responses is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the response of the cervical muscles to increasing low-velocity frontal impacts offset by 45 degrees to the right, and to compare the quantitative effects of expected and unexpected impact. Ten healthy volunteers were subjected to frontal impacts, offset by 45 degrees to the subject's right, of 5.1-, 8.7-, 12-, and 13.7-m/s(2) peak acceleration at two levels of expectation: expected and unexpected. Bilateral electromyograms of the sternocleidomastoids, trapezii, and splenii capitis were recorded. Triaxial accelerometers recorded the acceleration of the chair, torso at the shoulder level, and head of the participant. At a peak acceleration of 13.7 m/s(2), with an unexpected impact, the contralateral trapezius (i.e., left trapezius in a right anterolateral impact) generated 83% of its maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram, whereas all other muscles generated 50% or less of this variable. Although it generated less EMG, the splenius capitis muscle also tended to show an asymmetric EMG response, with the left (contralateral) splenius capitis generating a higher percentage (46%) of its maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram than the ipsilateral (right) splenius capitis. In comparison, the sternocleidomastoid muscles behaved symmetrically and generated 25% or less of this variable under all impact conditions. Similarly, the times to onset and times to peak electromyogram for the contralateral (left) splenius capitis and (left) trapezius progressively decreased with increasing levels of acceleration (p<0.01). Subjects exhibited lower levels of their maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram when the impact was expected (p<0.01). The kinetic variables and the electromyographic variables regressed significantly on the acceleration (p<0.01). In response to right anterolateral impacts, muscle responses were greater with higher levels of acceleration, and more specifically, when a frontal impact is offset to the subject's right, it results in not only increased EMG generation in the contralateral trapezius, but the splenius capitis contralateral to the direction of impact also bears part of the force of the neck pertubation. Expecting or being aware of imminent impact plays a role in reducing muscle responses in low-velocity anterolateral impacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060820      PMCID: PMC3476581          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0700-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Role of awareness in head-neck acceleration in low velocity rear-end impacts.

Authors:  S Kumar; Y Narayan; T Amell
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Cervical muscle dysfunction in chronic whiplash-associated disorder grade 2: the relevance of the trauma.

Authors:  Marc J Nederhand; Hermie J Hermens; Maarten J IJzerman; Dennis C Turk; Gerrit Zilvold
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Analysis of low velocity frontal impacts.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Yogesh Narayan; Tyler Amell
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims for whiplash injury.

Authors:  J D Cassidy; L J Carroll; P Côté; M Lemstra; A Berglund; A Nygren
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Chronic neck pain disability due to an acute whiplash injury.

Authors:  Marc J Nederhand; Hermie J Hermens; Maarten J IJzerman; Dennis C Turk; Gerrit Zilvold
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Cervical muscle dysfunction in the chronic whiplash associated disorder grade II (WAD-II).

Authors:  M J Nederhand; M J IJzerman; H J Hermens; C T Baten; G Zilvold
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  An electromyographic study of low-velocity rear-end impacts.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Yogesh Narayan; Tyler Amell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; M L Skovron; L R Salmi; J D Cassidy; J Duranceau; S Suissa; E Zeiss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Clinical response of human subjects to rear-end automobile collisions.

Authors:  J R Brault; J B Wheeler; G P Siegmund; E J Brault
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Electromyography of superficial cervical muscles with exertion in the sagittal, coronal and oblique planes.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Yogesh Narayan; Tyler Amell; Robert Ferrari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of sternocleidomastoid muscle in simulated low velocity rear-end impacts.

Authors:  Ivonne A Hernández; Ken R Fyfe; Giseon Heo; Paul W Major
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of right anterolateral impacts: the effect of trunk flexion on the cervical muscle whiplash response.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan; Edgar Vieira
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Analysis of right anterolateral impacts: the effect of head rotation on the cervical muscle whiplash response.

Authors:  Shrawan Kumar; Robert Ferrari; Yogesh Narayan
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.