Literature DB >> 9454959

Comparison of histologic stains for use in PCR analysis of microdissected, paraffin-embedded tissues.

M P Burton1, B G Schneider, R Brown, N Escamilla-Ponce, M L Gulley.   

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of six different histologic stains on the productivity of PCR amplification of DNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue samples. The tissue was collected from glass slides by microdissection techniques, whereby tiny portions of tissue are visually identified through a microscope and selectively resected for subsequent DNA extraction and PCR amplification. We found that the success of PCR amplification depended on the type of histologic stain that was used to facilitate microscopic visualization of the undeparaffinized tissue section. The best results were obtained with methyl green and nuclear fast red, while Wright's stain yielded less PCR product. Two other stains, Evans blue and light-green SF yellowish (also known as the counterstain for geomori methenamine silver stain) yielded sufficient PCR products; however, their staining characteristics did not afford satisfactory visualization of nuclear chromatin to discriminate between benign and malignant cells. Our most significant finding was that a commonly used histologic stain, hematoxylin, failed to produce DNA templates that could be consistently amplified by PCR. In conclusion, it is prudent to avoid hematoxylin stains when preparing tissues as starting material for PCR. Among the remaining five stains that were evaluated, the best choice depends on the differential staining characteristics of the cells to be dissected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9454959     DOI: 10.2144/98241st01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechniques        ISSN: 0736-6205            Impact factor:   1.993


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative amplification of genomic DNA from histological tissue sections after staining with nuclear dyes and laser capture microdissection.

Authors:  T Ehrig; S A Abdulkadir; S M Dintzis; J Milbrandt; M A Watson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Laser capture microdissection and two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: evaluation of tissue preparation and sample limitations.

Authors:  Rachel A Craven; Nick Totty; Patricia Harnden; Peter J Selby; Rosamonde E Banks
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  No evidence for interference of h&e staining in DNA testing: usefulness of DNA extraction from H&E-stained archival tissue sections.

Authors:  Teppei Morikawa; Kaori Shima; Aya Kuchiba; Mai Yamauchi; Noriko Tanaka; Yu Imamura; Xiaoyun Liao; Zhi Rong Qian; Mohan Brahmandam; Janina A Longtine; Neal I Lindeman; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 4.  Beyond laser microdissection technology: follow the yellow brick road for cancer research.

Authors:  Luc G Legres; Anne Janin; Christophe Masselon; Philippe Bertheau
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer and pre-cancerous lesions.

Authors:  Ping Liu; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Yun Shao; Dao-Fu Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Capillary electrophoresis artifact due to eosin: implications for the interpretation of molecular diagnostic assays.

Authors:  Kathleen M Murphy; Karin D Berg; Tanya Geiger; Michael Hafez; Katie A Flickinger; Lisa Cooper; Patrick Pearson; James R Eshleman
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Pancreatic cancer associated fibroblasts display normal allelotypes.

Authors:  Kimberly Walter; Noriyuki Omura; Seung-Mo Hong; Margaret Griffith; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 8.  Laser capture microdissection in forensic research: a review.

Authors:  Mado Vandewoestyne; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Segment-specific expression of sodium-phosphate cotransporters NaPi-IIa and -IIc and interacting proteins in mouse renal proximal tubules.

Authors:  C Madjdpour; D Bacic; B Kaissling; H Murer; J Biber
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Liver gene expression profiles of rats treated with clofibric acid: comparison of whole liver and laser capture microdissected liver.

Authors:  Cécile Michel; Chantal Desdouets; Béatrice Sacre-Salem; Jean-Charles Gautier; Ruth Roberts; Eric Boitier
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.