Literature DB >> 14633594

Liver gene expression profiles of rats treated with clofibric acid: comparison of whole liver and laser capture microdissected liver.

Cécile Michel1, Chantal Desdouets, Béatrice Sacre-Salem, Jean-Charles Gautier, Ruth Roberts, Eric Boitier.   

Abstract

Clofibric acid (CLO) is a peroxisome proliferator (PP) that acts through the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha, leading to hepatocarcinogenesis in rodents. CLO-induced hepatocarcinogenesis is a multi-step process, first transforming normal liver cells into foci. The combination of laser capture microdissection (LCM) and genomics has the potential to provide expression profiles from such small cell clusters, giving an opportunity to understand the process of cancer development in response to PPs. To our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the impact of the successive steps of LCM procedure on gene expression profiling by comparing profiles from LCM samples to those obtained with non-microdissected liver samples collected after a 1 month CLO treatment in the rat. We showed that hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and laser microdissection itself do not impact on RNA quality. However, the overall process of the LCM procedure affects the RNA quality, resulting in a bias in the gene profiles. Nonetheless, this bias did not prevent accurate determination of a CLO-specific molecular signature. Thus, gene-profiling analysis of microdissected foci, identified by H&E staining may provide insight into the mechanisms underlying non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat by allowing identification of specific genes that are regulated by CLO in early pre-neoplastic foci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14633594      PMCID: PMC1892366          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63577-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  37 in total

1.  The slow induction of resistant hepatocytes during initiation of hepatocarcinogenesis by the nongenotoxic carcinogen clofibrate.

Authors:  M K Nagai; E Farber
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.362

2.  Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription.

Authors:  L R Baugh; A A Hill; E L Brown; C P Hunter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  cDNA array hybridization after laser-assisted microdissection from nonneoplastic tissue.

Authors:  Ludger Fink; Stephanie Kohlhoff; Maria Magdalena Stein; Jörg Hänze; Norbert Weissmann; Frank Rose; Ercan Akkayagil; Daniel Manz; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Rainer Maria Bohle
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  mRNA expression profiling of laser microbeam microdissected cells from slender embryonic structures.

Authors:  Stefan J Scheidl; Sven Nilsson; Mattias Kalén; Mats Hellström; Minoru Takemoto; Joakim Håkansson; Per Lindahl
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Prohibitin co-localizes with Rb in the nucleus and recruits N-CoR and HDAC1 for transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Sheng Wang; Gina Fusaro; Jaya Padmanabhan; Srikumar P Chellappan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Recent update on the PPAR alpha-null mouse.

Authors:  F J Gonzalez
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1997 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 4.079

7.  Induction of altered hepatic foci in rats by the administration of hypolipidemic peroxisome proliferators alone or following a single dose of diethylnitrosamine.

Authors:  H P Glauert; D Beer; M S Rao; M Schwarz; Y D Xu; T L Goldsworthy; J Coloma; H C Pitot
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Apoptosis, mitosis and cyclophilin-40 expression in regressing peroxisome proliferator-induced adenomas.

Authors:  R T Miller; S P Anderson; J C Corton; R C Cattley
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Role of PPAR alpha in the mechanism of action of the nongenotoxic carcinogen and peroxisome proliferator Wy-14,643.

Authors:  J M Peters; R C Cattley; F J Gonzalez
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Enhancement of peroxisomal enzymes, cytochrome P-452 and DNA synthesis in putative preneoplastic foci of rat liver treated with the peroxisome proliferator nafenopin.

Authors:  B Grasl-Kraupp; W Huber; W Just; G Gibson; R Schulte-Hermann
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  14 in total

1.  Stabilization of RNA during laser capture microdissection by performing experiments under argon atmosphere or using ethanol as a solvent in staining solutions.

Authors:  Mathieu Clément-Ziza; Arnold Munnich; Stanislas Lyonnet; Francis Jaubert; Claude Besmond
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Laser capture microdissection and single-cell RT-PCR without RNA purification.

Authors:  Kathryne Melissa Keays; Gregory P Owens; Alanna M Ritchie; Donald H Gilden; Mark P Burgoon
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  ADAM12 and ADAM17 gene expression in laser-capture microdissected and non-microdissected breast tumors.

Authors:  Diana Narita; Edward Seclaman; Razvan Ilina; Natalia Cireap; Sorin Ursoniu; Andrei Anghel
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Nuclear receptors in the multidrug resistance through the regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters.

Authors:  Yakun Chen; Yong Tang; Changxiong Guo; Jiuhui Wang; Debasish Boral; Daotai Nie
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  Highly tissue substructure-specific effects of human papilloma virus in mucosa of HIV-infected patients revealed by laser-dissection microscopy-assisted gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Nicole Baumgarth; Richard Szubin; Greg M Dolganov; Mitchell R Watnik; Deborah Greenspan; Maria Da Costa; Joel M Palefsky; Richard Jordan; Mario Roederer; John S Greenspan
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Gene expression analyses of neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes isolated by laser capture microdissection from human brain: detrimental effects of laboratory humidity.

Authors:  Gregory A Ordway; Attila Szebeni; Michelle M Duffourc; Sophie Dessus-Babus; Katalin Szebeni
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Digitally guided microdissection aids somatic mutation detection in difficult to dissect tumors.

Authors:  Katherine Geiersbach; Nils Adey; Noah Welker; Danielle Elsberry; Elisabeth Malmberg; Sumie Edwards; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Mohamed Salama; Mary Bronner
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2015-12-15

8.  Macrodissection versus microdissection of rectal carcinoma: minor influence of stroma cells to tumor cell gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Elza C de Bruin; Simone van de Pas; Esther H Lips; Ronald van Eijk; Minke M C van der Zee; Marcel Lombaerts; Tom van Wezel; Corrie A M Marijnen; J Han J M van Krieken; Jan Paul Medema; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Paul H C Eilers; Lucy T C Peltenburg
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Analysis of differential gene expression in colorectal cancer and stroma using fluorescence-activated cell sorting purification.

Authors:  M J Smith; A C Culhane; M Donovan; J C Coffey; B D Barry; M A Kelly; D G Higgins; J H Wang; W O Kirwan; T G Cotter; H P Redmond
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Impact of sample acquisition and linear amplification on gene expression profiling of lung adenocarcinoma: laser capture micro-dissection cell-sampling versus bulk tissue-sampling.

Authors:  Eric W Klee; Sibel Erdogan; Lori Tillmans; Farhad Kosari; Zhifu Sun; Dennis A Wigle; Ping Yang; Marie C Aubry; George Vasmatzis
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.