Literature DB >> 9451260

Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study.

A Cogo1, A W Lensing, M M Koopman, F Piovella, S Siragusa, P S Wells, S Villalta, H R Büller, A G Turpie, P Prandoni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of withholding anticoagulant treatment from patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis but normal findings on compression ultrasonography.
DESIGN: Compression ultrasonography was done with a simplified diagnostic procedure limited to the common femoral vein in the groin and the popliteal vein extending down to the trifurcation of the calf veins. Patients with normal ultrasonography findings at presentation were retested 1 week later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of venous thromboembolic complications during follow up for 6 months in patients in whom anticoagulant treatment was withheld on the basis of normal results on two ultrasonography tests 1 week apart.
SETTING: University research centres in four hospitals.
RESULTS: A total of 1702 patients were included in the study. Abnormal results on compression ultrasonography at presentation or at 1 week were found in 400 and 12 patients, respectively, for a prevalence of deep vein thrombosis of 24%. None of the patients were lost to follow up. Venous thromboembolic complications during the week of serial testing occurred in a single patient and in eight patients during 6 months' follow up, resulting in a cumulative rate of venous thromboembolic complications of 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.3% to 1.2%). The mean number of extra hospital visits and additional tests required per initially referred patient was 0.8.
CONCLUSION: It is safe to withhold anticoagulant treatment from patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis who have a normal result on compression ultrasonography at the time of presentation and at 1 week.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9451260      PMCID: PMC2665362          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7124.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  45 in total

Review 1.  Current and future role of ultrasound in the emergency department.

Authors:  H C Burnett; D A Nicholson
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

Review 2.  [Ultrasound diagnostic techniques in dermatologic angiology and phlebology].

Authors:  G Hesse; H Stiegler
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Clinical applications of bedside ultrasonography in internal and emergency medicine.

Authors:  Vincenzo Arienti; Valeria Camaggi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Evaluation of the Simplify D-dimer assay as a screening test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in an emergency department.

Authors:  D Neale; C Tovey; A Vali; S Davies; K Myers; M Obiako; V Ramkumar; A Hafiz
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Risk of Venous Thromboembolism after a Single Normal Proximal Lower Extremity Venous Ultrasound.

Authors:  Myles M Mitsunaga; Shannon Kogachi; Hyo-Chun Yoon
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

Review 7.  Advances in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Philip S Wells
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Resident performed two-point compression ultrasound is inadequate for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in the critically III.

Authors:  Jonathan Caronia; Adrian Sarzynski; Babak Tofighi; Ramyar Mahdavi; Charles Allred; Georgia Panagopoulos; Bushra Mina
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Venous thromboembolism after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert W Teasell; Jane T Hsieh; Jo-Anne L Aubut; Janice J Eng; Andrei Krassioukov; Linh Tu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  National and Regional Trends in Deep Vein Thrombosis Hospitalization Rates, Discharge Disposition, and Outcomes for Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Karl E Minges; Behnood Bikdeli; Yun Wang; Robert R Attaran; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.