Literature DB >> 16804763

25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.

Hanna Tolonen1, Satu Helakorpi, Kirsi Talala, Ville Helasoja, Tuija Martelin, Ritva Prättälä.   

Abstract

When estimating population level changes in health indicators, the declining response rate, especially if also the characteristics of non-respondents are changing may bias the outcome. There is evidence that survey response rates are declining in many countries. It is also known that respondents and non-respondents differ in their socio-economic and demographic status as well as in their health and health behaviours. There is no information about the changes in the differences between respondents and non-respondents over time. Our purpose was to investigate the changes over time in the differences between respondents and non-respondents in respect to their sex, age, marital status and educational level. The data from the Finnish Adult Health Behaviour Survey (1978-2002) was used. The response rate declined over the past 25 years for both men and women in all age groups. The decline was faster among men than women, and also faster in younger age groups than older age groups. There is a marked difference in the response rate between married and non-married persons but it did not change over time. Also the response rate between different educational levels differed for both men and women, and this difference increased over the years. The declining response rate and at the same time occurring change in the non-respondent characteristics will decrease the representativeness of the results, limit the comparability of the results with other surveys, increase the bias of the trend estimates and limit the comparability of the results between population groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804763     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  11 in total

1.  Patterns of non-response to a mail survey.

Authors:  C A Macera; K L Jackson; D R Davis; J J Kronenfeld; S N Blair
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  The effects of non-response on statistical inference.

Authors:  J Jones
Journal:  J Health Soc Policy       Date:  1996

3.  Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Annette Dobson; Sangita Kulathinal
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.

Authors:  E Shahar; A R Folsom; R Jackson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Telephone health surveys: potential bias from noncompletion.

Authors:  S I Mishra; D Dooley; R Catalano; S Serxner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Changes in health status and health behavior among Finnish adults 1978-1993.

Authors:  E Lahelma; O Rahkonen; M A Berg; S Helakorp; R Prättälä; P Puska; A Uutela
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  Educational inequalities in cause-specific mortality in middle-aged and older men and women in eight western European populations.

Authors:  Martijn Huisman; Anton E Kunst; Matthias Bopp; Jens-Kristian Borgan; Carme Borrell; Giuseppe Costa; Patrick Deboosere; Sylvie Gadeyne; Myer Glickman; Chiara Marinacci; Christoph Minder; Enrique Regidor; Tapani Valkonen; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Feb 5-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Social class, health behaviour, and mortality among men and women in eastern Finland.

Authors:  J Pekkanen; J Tuomilehto; A Uutela; E Vartiainen; A Nissinen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02
View more
  90 in total

1.  Estimating physical activity using a cell phone questionnaire sent by means of short message service (SMS): a randomized population-based study.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Sven Sandin; Christin Bexelius; Jan-Eric Litton; Marie Löf
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Strategies for Increasing the Accuracy of Interviewer Observations of Respondent Features: Evidence from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Brady T West; Frauke Kreuter
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2018-04-23

3.  Recent trends in publications in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results.

Authors:  Andreas Stang
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  A modified random walk door-to-door recruitment strategy for collecting social and biological data relating to mental health, substance use, addiction, and violence problems in a Canadian community.

Authors:  Andrea Flynn; Paul F Tremblay; Jürgen Rehm; Samantha Wells
Journal:  Int J Alcohol Drug Res       Date:  2013-06-09

6.  Can incentives undermine intrinsic motivation to participate in epidemiologic surveys?

Authors:  Marika Wenemark; Asa Vernby; Annika Lindahl Norberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Peripheral arterial disease: lack of awareness in Canada.

Authors:  Marge Lovell; Kenneth Harris; Thomas Forbes; Gwen Twillman; Beth Abramson; Michael H Criqui; Paul Schroeder; Emile R Mohler; Alan T Hirsch
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Marital status, educational level and household income explain part of the excess mortality of survey non-respondents.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Tiina Laatikainen; Satu Helakorpi; Kirsi Talala; Tuija Martelin; Ritva Prättälä
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  The use of oral contraceptive before pregnancy and breastfeeding duration: a cross-sectional study with retrospective ascertainment.

Authors:  Nelís Soto-Ramírez; Wilfried Karmaus
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.461

10.  The socio-demographic patterning of sexual risk behaviour: a survey of young men in Finland and Estonia.

Authors:  Minna Nikula; Mika Gissler; Vesa Jormanainen; Made Laanpere; Heikki Kunnas; Elina Haavio-Mannila; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.