Literature DB >> 22531973

The effect of reminders in a web-based intervention study.

Madeleine Svensson1, Tobias Svensson, Andreas Wolff Hansen, Ylva Trolle Lagerros.   

Abstract

Knowledge on effective strategies to encourage participation in epidemiological web-based research is scant. We studied the effects of reminders on overall participation. 3,876 employees were e-mailed a baseline web-based lifestyle questionnaire. Nine months later, a follow-up questionnaire was sent. To encourage study participation, 4-5 and 11 e-mail reminders were sent at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Additional reminders (media articles, flyers, SMS etc) were also administered. Reminders (e-mails + additional) were given in low (≤ 6 reminders), medium (7-9 reminders) or high amounts (>9 reminders). Participation was examined with respect to participant characteristics (i.e. age, sex, Body Mass Index, occupation), type/number of reminders, and time of participation. Most participants were males, 35-49 years, and field workers (non-office based). About 29 % responded before any e-mail reminder, following 26 and 45 % after 1 respective ≥ 2 e-mail reminders. Participant characteristics were not related to when the participants responded. The 4-5 e-mail reminders increased total response rate by 15 %, the eleven by 21 % (greatest increases in September). Those receiving medium amounts of reminders (reference) had the highest response rate (75 %), likewise office workers (54 %) compared to field workers (33 %). High amounts of reminders were particularly effective on office workers. The participants' characteristics were not related to when they responded in this web-based study. Frequent reminders were effective on response rates, especially for those with high Internet availability. The highest increases in response rates were found in September.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22531973     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9687-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  27 in total

1.  E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.

Authors:  Rachelle Seguin; Marshall Godwin; Susan MacDonald; Marnie McCall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Web-based and mailed questionnaires: a comparison of response rates and compliance.

Authors:  Katarina Augustsson Bälter; Olle Bälter; Elinor Fondell; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines.

Authors:  S Eaker; R Bergström; A Bergström; H O Adami; O Nyren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Use of a web-based questionnaire in the Black Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Cordelia W Russell; Deborah A Boggs; Julie R Palmer; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Participation in a workplace web-based health risk assessment program.

Authors:  E B Colkesen; R A Kraaijenhagen; M H W Frings-Dresen; J K Sluiter; C K van Kalken; J G P Tijssen; R J G Peters
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 6.  Seasonal variations in physical activity and implications for human health.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Patterns of GPS measured time outdoors after school and objective physical activity in English children: the PEACH project.

Authors:  Ashley R Cooper; Angie S Page; Benedict W Wheeler; Melvyn Hillsdon; Pippa Griew; Russell Jago
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Ellen C Jørstad-Stein; Simon Gates; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison (2).

Authors:  Pam Leece; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Marc F Swiontkowski; Emil H Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta; P J Devereaux; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Adherence in Internet-based interventions.

Authors:  Silje C Wangberg; Trine S Bergmo; Jan-Are K Johnsen
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Identification of Behavior Change Techniques and Engagement Strategies to Design a Smartphone App to Reduce Alcohol Consumption Using a Formal Consensus Method.

Authors:  Claire Garnett; David Crane; Robert West; Jamie Brown; Susan Michie
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.773

3.  A Web-based, computer-tailored smoking prevention program to prevent children from starting to smoke after transferring to secondary school: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Henricus-Paul Cremers; Liesbeth Mercken; Math Candel; Hein de Vries; Anke Oenema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  A Smartphone App to Promote an Active Lifestyle in Lower-Educated Working Young Adults: Development, Usability, Acceptability, and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Dorien Simons; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Peter Clarys; Katrien De Cocker; Corneel Vandelanotte; Benedicte Deforche
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  Reporting Survey Based Studies - a Primer for Authors.

Authors:  Prithvi Sanjeevkumar Gaur; Olena Zimba; Vikas Agarwal; Latika Gupta
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Periodic email prompts to re-use an internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle program: influence of prompt content and timing.

Authors:  Francine Schneider; Hein de Vries; Math Candel; Angelique van de Kar; Liesbeth van Osch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Do email and mobile phone prompts stimulate primary school children to reuse an Internet-delivered smoking prevention intervention?

Authors:  Henricus-Paul Cremers; Liesbeth Mercken; Rik Crutzen; Paul Willems; Hein de Vries; Anke Oenema
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Association between recruitment methods and attrition in Internet-based studies.

Authors:  Paolo Bajardi; Daniela Paolotti; Alessandro Vespignani; Ken Eames; Sebastian Funk; W John Edmunds; Clement Turbelin; Marion Debin; Vittoria Colizza; Ronald Smallenburg; Carl Koppeschaar; Ana O Franco; Vitor Faustino; AnnaSara Carnahan; Moa Rehn; Franco Merletti; Jeroen Douwes; Ridvan Firestone; Lorenzo Richiardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effect of Tailored Web-Based Feedback and Optional Telephone Coaching on Health Improvements: A Randomized Intervention Among Employees in the Transport Service Industry.

Authors:  Madeleine Solenhill; Alessandra Grotta; Elena Pasquali; Linda Bakkman; Rino Bellocco; Ylva Trolle Lagerros
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Effect and Process Evaluation of a Smartphone App to Promote an Active Lifestyle in Lower Educated Working Young Adults: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Dorien Simons; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Peter Clarys; Katrien De Cocker; Corneel Vandelanotte; Benedicte Deforche
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.773

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.