Literature DB >> 9438184

Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims?

E A Walker1, E Newman, M Koss, D Bernstein.   

Abstract

Although the number of questionnaire surveys examining the sequelae of prior sexual and physical victimization has increased over the last decade, little attention has been given to understanding the impact of such studies on participants. As part of a larger study of long-term effects of prior sexual and physical victimization, 500 randomly selected women in an HMO received a comprehensive questionnaire including multiple symptomatic distress measures and several items inquiring into previous history of sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and neglect. They also completed a short rating scale asking about their reactions to completing the questionnaire. Despite the sensitive content, the women who participated generally found the experience to be a positive one. Only a small number of women were more upset than they had anticipated, but the vast majority felt they would have completed the survey even if they had known in advance how they would feel. The subset of women who did express distress was significantly different from the group that did not, with respect to other measures of symptomatic distress and trauma exposure. These data suggest that surveys that inquire into prior episodes of childhood victimization are generally well tolerated by women who participate, and that, although a small number may be disturbed by these investigations, in general, adverse reactions may be less common than previously anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9438184     DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(97)00061-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  15 in total

1.  Participation in a trauma-focused epidemiological investigation may result in sensitization for current health problems.

Authors:  Margot J Verschuur; Philip Spinhoven; Arnold A P van Emmerik; Frits R Rosendaal
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  Adolescents' and adults' experiences of being surveyed about violence and abuse: a systematic review of harms, benefits, and regrets.

Authors:  Tracy McClinton Appollis; Crick Lund; Petrus J de Vries; Catherine Mathews
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Impact of daily assessments on distress and PTSD symptoms in trauma-exposed women.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Debra L Kaysen; Kristen P Lindgren; Jessica Blayney; Tracy L Simpson
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2013-11-19

4.  Address-Based Sampling for Recruiting Rural Subpopulations: A 2-Phase, Multimode Approach.

Authors:  Tiffany L Thomson; Julianna M Nemeth; Juan Peng; Bo Lu; Amy K Ferketich; Electra D Paskett; Mary Ellen Wewers
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Applying experience sampling methods to partner violence research: safety and feasibility in a 90-day study of community women.

Authors:  Tami P Sullivan; Enna Khondkaryan; Nancy P Dos Santos; Erica N Peters
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2011-02

6.  Seriously Injured Urban Black Men's Perceptions of Clinical Research Participation.

Authors:  Marta M Bruce; Connie M Ulrich; Nancy Kassam-Adams; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-12-22

7.  Acute effects of trauma-focused research procedures on participant safety and distress.

Authors:  Vanessa M Brown; Jennifer L Strauss; Kevin S LaBar; Andrea L Gold; Gregory McCarthy; Rajendra A Morey
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Emotional risks to respondents in survey research.

Authors:  Susan M Labott; Timothy P Johnson; Michael Fendrich; Norah C Feeny
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Perceived Risks and Benefits in IPV and HIV Research: Listening to the Voices of HIV-Positive African American Women.

Authors:  Nicole M Overstreet; Mukadder Okuyan; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Perceptions of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) among women in an HIV-positive prevention program.

Authors:  Larissa J Estes; Linda E Lloyd; Michelle Teti; Sheela Raja; Lisa Bowleg; Kristi L Allgood; Nancy Glick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.