Literature DB >> 9437785

Screening high-risk adolescent males for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Obtaining urine specimens in the field.

R A Gunn1, G D Podschun, S Fitzgerald, M F Hovell, C E Farshy, C M Black, J R Greenspan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reported case data suggest that few men are being tested for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection (female:male reported case ratio is > 5:1) partially because men seek preventive health services less frequently than women and, until recently, obtaining a CT specimen from men required a urethral swab, which has low patient acceptability. A study was conducted in San Diego, CA, to determine whether urine specimens could be obtained from high-risk teen males in the field using a peer teen outreach approach. GOALS: Identify teen males infected with CT and provide treatment and partner management services. STUDY
DESIGN: Prevalence survey of 261 teen males and a program cost evaluation.
RESULTS: During the 6.5-month study period (Dec 15, 1995 to June 30, 1996) an estimated 1,860 teen males were approached and 261 submitted a urine specimen; 16 (6.1%) were positive by polymerase chain reaction. All positive males were treated with azithromycin, 1 gm, in the field, and 9 female sex partners were treated, 7 of whom were CT positive. The cost per specimen obtained and per CT infection identified was $103 and $1,677, respectively. The annual cost for adding a peer teen outreach service to an existing STD program using existing staff and adding 1.2 full-time equivalents of outreach time is approximately $25,000.
CONCLUSION: Peer teen outreach and in-field collection of urine specimens appear to be an acceptable alternative for screening teen males for CT and should be further evaluated in other communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9437785     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199801000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  11 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating outreach clinics.

Authors:  E A Davidson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  Recent advances: Sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  R J Gilson; A Mindel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-12

3.  News from the frontline: sexually transmitted infections in teenagers attending a genitourinary clinic in south east London.

Authors:  S Creighton; S Edwards; J Welch; R Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.

Authors:  B O Boekeloo; M H Snyder; M Bobbin; G R Burstein; D Conley; T C Quinn; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 5.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.

Authors:  T E Roberts; S Robinson; P Barton; S Bryan; N Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  The Use of Urine and Self-obtained Vaginal Swabs for the Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

Authors:  Charlotte A. Gaydos; Anne M. Rompalo
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Impact of patient characteristics on performance of nucleic acid amplification tests and DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with genital infections.

Authors:  Jeanne M Marrazzo; Robert E Johnson; Timothy A Green; Walter E Stamm; Julius Schachter; Gail Bolan; Edward W Hook; Robert B Jones; David H Martin; Michael E St Louis; Carolyn M Black
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in multi-ethnic urban youth: a pilot combining STI health education and outreach testing in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  H M Götz; I K Veldhuijzen; J M Ossewaarde; O de Zwart; J H Richardus
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis. New methods are needed to assess the burden of illness from chlamydia.

Authors:  I Simms; G Hughes; M Catchpole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-05

10.  A randomized trial of home versus clinic-based sexually transmitted disease screening among men.

Authors:  Mary M Reagan; Hanna Xu; Shirley L Shih; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.