Literature DB >> 12407243

Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.

B O Boekeloo1, M H Snyder, M Bobbin, G R Burstein, D Conley, T C Quinn, J M Zenilman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in provider willingness to screen all sexually active male and female adolescents for chlamydia and to determine whether concerns about cost effectiveness of screening are related to provider willingness to screen for chlamydia.
METHODS: All primary care providers in a managed care organisation self administered a survey about screening all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.
RESULTS: Respondents were 217 physicians (MDs) and 121 nurse practitioners (NPs) or physician assistants (PAs). Excluding obstetrician/gynaecologists, more providers were willing to routinely screen adolescent females than males for chlamydia (67% v 49% respectively; p<0.001). Independent predictors of provider willingness to screen both males and females included belief that routine screening is cost effective and being a NP/PA v an MD. Belief that chlamydia screening is easier in females than males independently predicted less willingness to screen males.
CONCLUSION: Information that reduces provider concern about the cost effectiveness of screening may increase provider willingness to screen adolescents for chlamydia. Availability of urine based tests may reduce provider beliefs that females are easier to screen than males and increase chlamydia screening in males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12407243      PMCID: PMC1744552          DOI: 10.1136/sti.78.5.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  28 in total

1.  Adolescent chlamydia testing practices and diagnosed infections in a large managed care organization.

Authors:  G R Burstein; M H Snyder; D Conley; B O Boekeloo; T C Quinn; J M Zenilman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.

Authors:  T Pierpoint; B Thomas; A Judd; R Brugha; D Taylor-Robinson; A Renton
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Frequency and thoroughness of STD/HIV risk assessment by physicians in a high-risk metropolitan area.

Authors:  B O Boekeloo; E S Marx; A H Kral; S C Coughlin; M Bowman; D L Rabin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Determinants of persistent and recurrent Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women: results of a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  W L Whittington; C Kent; P Kissinger; M K Oh; J D Fortenberry; S E Hillis; B Litchfield; G A Bolan; M E St Louis; T A Farley; H H Handsfield
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 5.  Screening men for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: have we fully explored the possibilities?

Authors:  K A Fenton
Journal:  Commun Dis Public Health       Date:  2000-06

6.  Control of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female army recruits: cost-effective screening and treatment in training cohorts to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  M R Howell; J C Gaydos; K T McKee; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Barriers to screening sexually active adolescent women for chlamydia: a survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  R L Cook; H C Wiesenfeld; M R Ashton; M A Krohn; T Zamborsky; S H Scholle
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Incidence and repeat infection rates of Chlamydia trachomatis among male and female patients in an STD clinic: implications for screening and rescreening.

Authors:  Cornelis A Rietmeijer; Rogier Van Bemmelen; Franklyn N Judson; John M Douglas
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Evaluation of chlamydia and gonorrhea screening criteria: San Francisco sexually transmitted disease clinic: 1997 to 1998.

Authors:  E L Ciemins; C K Kent; J Flood; J D Klausner
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Use of reproductive health services among young men, 1995.

Authors:  L E Porter; L Ku
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.012

View more
  7 in total

1.  Chlamydia screening of adolescent females: a survey of providers in Hawaii.

Authors:  Chika Muto McGrath; Alan R Katz; Maria Veneranda C Lee; Roger W Rochat
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-04

2.  Review of Clinical Trials Testing the Effectiveness of Clinician Intervention Approaches to Prevent Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Adolescent Outpatients.

Authors:  Bradley O Boekeloo; Melinda A Griffin
Journal:  Curr Pediatr Rev       Date:  2005-06

3.  Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Receipt Among Young Males Aged 15-24.

Authors:  Arik V Marcell; Susannah E Gibbs; Nanlesta A Pilgrim; Kathleen R Page; Renata Arrington-Sanders; Jacky M Jennings; Penny S Loosier; Patricia J Dittus
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Cervicitis in adolescents: do clinicians understand diagnosis and treatment?

Authors:  Jennifer L Woods; Sarabeth L Bailey; Devon J Hensel; Amy M Scurlock
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Chlamydia trachomatis reinfection rates among female adolescents seeking rescreening in school-based health centers.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Catherine Wright; Billie Jo Wood; Gerry Waterfield; Sharon Hobson; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Promoting chlamydia screening with posters and leaflets in general practice--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elaine Freeman; Rebecca Howell-Jones; Isabel Oliver; Sarah Randall; William Ford-Young; Philippa Beckwith; Cliodna McNulty
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Chlamydia screening practices among physicians and community nurses in Yukon, Canada.

Authors:  Karolina Machalek; Brendan E Hanley; Joy N Kajiwara; Paula E Pasquali; Cathy J Stannard
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 1.228

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.