Literature DB >> 15695648

Impact of patient characteristics on performance of nucleic acid amplification tests and DNA probe for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with genital infections.

Jeanne M Marrazzo1, Robert E Johnson, Timothy A Green, Walter E Stamm, Julius Schachter, Gail Bolan, Edward W Hook, Robert B Jones, David H Martin, Michael E St Louis, Carolyn M Black.   

Abstract

The performance of nucleic acid amplified tests (NAAT) for Chlamydia trachomatis at the cervix and in urine was examined in 3,551 women, and the impacts of clinical findings (age, endocervical and urethral inflammation, menses, and gonococcal coinfection) were assessed. Ligase chain reaction (LCR) and first-generation uniplex PCR were studied relative to an unamplified DNA probe (PACE2) and to an expanded, independent diagnostic reference standard. Relative to the expanded standard, cervical or urine LCR was generally the most sensitive test in most subgroups. Increased detection by NAAT of cervical C. trachomatis over PACE2 was highest among women without mucopurulent endocervical discharge versus those with (relative increase in positivity with cervical LCR, 46%) and among women > or =20 years old versus younger women (relative increase in positivity with cervical LCR, 45%). The sensitivity of cervical PCR was highest when mucopurulent endocervical discharge was present (84%) and highest for cervical LCR when cervical gonococcal coinfection was detected (91%). Urethral inflammation was associated with higher sensitivities of urine LCR (86 compared to 70% when inflammation was absent) and PCR (82 compared to 62% when inflammation was absent). Menses had no effect on test performance. The effects of patient characteristics on test specificities were less pronounced and were closely related to observed sensitivities. These findings support expanded use of NAAT for screening and diagnosis of C. trachomatis in diverse clinical populations of women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15695648      PMCID: PMC548082          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.577-584.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of dry and wet transported intravaginal swabs in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in female soldiers by PCR.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Kimberly A Crotchfelt; Nina Shah; Marie Tennant; Thomas C Quinn; Joel C Gaydos; Kelly T McKee; Anne M Rompalo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A school-based Chlamydia control program using DNA amplification technology.

Authors:  D A Cohen; M Nsuami; R B Etame; S Tropez-Sims; S Abdalian; T A Farley; D H Martin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Screening high-risk adolescent males for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Obtaining urine specimens in the field.

Authors:  R A Gunn; G D Podschun; S Fitzgerald; M F Hovell; C E Farshy; C M Black; J R Greenspan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 4.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.

Authors:  R Pasternack; P Vuorinen; T Pitkäjärvi; M Koskela; A Miettinen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Quantitative culture of Chlamydia trachomatis: relationship of inclusion-forming units produced in culture to clinical manifestations and acute inflammation in urogenital disease.

Authors:  W M Geisler; R J Suchland; W L Whittington; W E Stamm
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC assays with the APTIMA combo 2 assay, the Abbott LCx assay, and direct fluorescent-antibody and culture assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  B Boyadzhyan; T Yashina; J H Yatabe; M Patnaik; C S Hill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States.

Authors:  William C Miller; Carol A Ford; Martina Morris; Mark S Handcock; John L Schmitz; Marcia M Hobbs; Myron S Cohen; Kathleen Mullan Harris; J Richard Udry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Head-to-head multicenter comparison of DNA probe and nucleic acid amplification tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women performed with an improved reference standard.

Authors:  Carolyn M Black; Jeanne Marrazzo; Robert E Johnson; Edward W Hook; Robert B Jones; Timothy A Green; Julius Schachter; Walter E Stamm; Gail Bolan; Michael E St Louis; David H Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Examination of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in environments mimicking normal and abnormal vaginal pH.

Authors:  Bushra Yasin; Mabel Pang; Elizabeth A Wagar; Robert I Lehrer
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  9 in total

1.  Performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  C A Gaydos; C P Cartwright; P Colaninno; J Welsch; J Holden; S Y Ho; E M Webb; C Anderson; R Bertuzis; L Zhang; T Miller; G Leckie; K Abravaya; J Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cervical specimen order and performance measures of Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Khalil G Ghanem; Robert E Johnson; Emilia H Koumans; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-03-14

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis load at matched anatomic sites: implications for screening strategies.

Authors:  Claude-Edouard C Michel; Christopher Sonnex; Christopher A Carne; John A White; Jose Paolo V Magbanua; Elpidio Cesar B Nadala; Helen H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical evaluation of the BD ProbeTec™ Chlamydia trachomatis Qx amplified DNA assay on the BD Viper™ system with XTR™ technology.

Authors:  Stephanie N Taylor; Barbara Van Der Pol; Rebecca Lillis; Edward W Hook; William Lebar; Thomas Davis; Deanna Fuller; Leandro Mena; Paul Fine; Charlotte A Gaydos; David H Martin
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Prevalence and treatment outcome of cervicitis of unknown etiology.

Authors:  Stephanie N Taylor; Shelly Lensing; Jane Schwebke; Rebecca Lillis; Leandro A Mena; Anita L Nelson; Anne Rinaldi; Lisa Saylor; Linda McNeil; Jeannette Y Lee
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.830

7.  Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Barbara Van Der Pol; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Nicole Quinn; Carey Clark; Grace E Daniel; Paula B Dixon; Edward W Hook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Molecular diagnostic techniques.

Authors:  Satu Kurkela; David W G Brown
Journal:  Medicine (Abingdon)       Date:  2009-09-19

9.  Chlamydia detection during the menstrual cycle: a cross-sectional study of women attending a sexual health service.

Authors:  Dana S Forcey; Jane S Hocking; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Catriona S Bradshaw; Marcus Y Chen; Glenda Fehler; Jessica L Nash; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.