Literature DB >> 9435991

Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine.

R Oertel1, R Rahn, W Kirch.   

Abstract

Articaine is the most widely used local anaesthetic agent in dentistry in a number of European countries. The amide structure of articaine is similar to that of other local anaesthetics, but it contains an additional ester group which is quickly hydrolysed by esterases. High performance liquid chromatography has been used to determine the concentrations of articaine and its metabolite articainic acid in serum. Rapid sample preparation is critical in the accurate determination of articaine serum concentrations, since blood and serum are the sites of metabolism. The time to maximum drug concentrations of articaine occurs about 10 to 15 minutes after submucosal injection of articaine 4% 80 mg, irrespective of epinephrine (adrenaline). The mean maximum plasma drug concentration is about 400 micrograms/L for articaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 and 580 micrograms/L for articaine without epinephrine. The elimination half-time of articaine is about 20 minutes. The rapid breakdown of articaine to the inactive metabolite articainic acid is related to a very low systemic toxicity and consequently to the possibility of repeated injections. Equal analgesic efficacy along with lower systemic toxicity (i.e. a wide therapeutic range) permits the use of articaine in higher concentrations than other amide-type local anaesthetics. Complete anaesthesia can be observed in nearly 90% of all cases, using articaine 4% 60 to 80 mg with epinephrine 1:200,000. Articaine is better able to diffuse through soft tissue and bone than other local anaesthetics. The concentration of articaine in the alveolus of a tooth in the upper jaw after extraction was about 100 times higher than that in systemic circulation. The plasma protein binding rate of articaine and articainic acid is 70%. It has been concluded that an unintentional intravascular injection of articaine 80 mg does not cause toxic effects in healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9435991     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  30 in total

1.  [Comparative investigations of anesthetic activity of 2- and 4% Articain].

Authors:  W H Raab; R Müller; H F Müller
Journal:  Quintessenz       Date:  1990-07

Review 2.  [Possible causes of incidents during dental anesthesia].

Authors:  E Knoll-Köhler
Journal:  ZWR       Date:  1991-10

3.  [A comparative study of equimolar solutions of lidocaine and articaine for anesthesia. A randomized double-blind cross-over study].

Authors:  S Ruprecht; E Knoll-Köhler
Journal:  Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed       Date:  1991

4.  [Recent clinical experiences with Ultracain preparations versus different lidocains].

Authors:  G Szabó; L Gáspár; T Divinyi
Journal:  Z Stomatol       Date:  1988-07

5.  [Analytical investigations with the local anesthetic ultracain (HOE 045) (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Uihlein
Journal:  Prakt Anaesth       Date:  1974-06

6.  [Pharmacokinetic studies with 35S-labelled Carticaine (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Hofer; R Eberl; H Altmann
Journal:  Prakt Anaesth       Date:  1974-06

7.  Evaluation of the toxicity of local anaesthetic agents in man.

Authors:  D B Scott
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  A simple method for the determination of articaine and its metabolite articainic acid in dentistry: application to a comparison of articaine and lidocaine concentrations in alveolus blood.

Authors:  R Oertel; K Richter; K Weile; T Gramatté; A Berndt; K Feller
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-10

9.  [Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of Articain after intramuscular injection in a male subject].

Authors:  I Hornke; H G Eckert; W Rupp
Journal:  Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

10.  Clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of articainic acid in one volunteer after intravenous administration.

Authors:  G E Van Oss; T B Vree; A M Baars; E F Termond; L H Booij
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1988-12-09
View more
  37 in total

1.  Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

Authors:  John Nusstein; Jeffrey Berlin; Al Reader; Mike Beck; Joel M Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2004

2.  Comparison of onset and duration of action of soft tissue and pulpal anesthesia with three volumes of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in maxillary infiltration anesthesia.

Authors:  K Sreekumar; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-18

Review 3.  Effect of preoperative oral analgesics on pulpal anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armin Shirvani; Sayna Shamszadeh; Mohammad Jafar Eghbal; Laleh Alim Marvasti; Saeed Asgary
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Articaine use in children: a review.

Authors:  R Leith; K Lynch; A C O'Connell
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-12

5.  Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars.

Authors:  J Venkat Narayanan; Prashanthi Gurram; Radhika Krishnan; Veerabahu Muthusubramanian; V Sadesh Kannan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-25

6.  Extraction of permanent maxillary teeth by only buccal infiltration of articaine.

Authors:  Anand Vijay Somuri; A Bhagavandas Rai; Manju Pillai
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

7.  Comparative investigations on the efficacy of articaine 4% (epinephrine 1:200,000) and articaine 2% (epinephrine 1:200,000) in local infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry--a randomised double-blind study.

Authors:  A Hintze; L Paessler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Anwar B Bataineh; Majid A Alwarafi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: a pilot study.

Authors:  José Lacet Lima; Eduardo Dias-Ribeiro; Julierme Ferreira-Rocha; Ramon Soares; Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa; Song Fan; Eduardo Sant'ana
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2013

10.  Cardiovascular Parameters during Submaximal Exercise following Submucous Administration of Articaine : A Comparison with Lidocaine and Placebo in Young Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  D Pittrow; C Schindler; U Maywald; D Tölge; W Kirch
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.