Literature DB >> 9435246

Mutations in the MRE11, RAD50, XRS2, and MRE2 genes alter chromatin configuration at meiotic DNA double-stranded break sites in premeiotic and meiotic cells.

K Ohta1, A Nicolas, M Furuse, A Nabetani, H Ogawa, T Shibata.   

Abstract

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, meiotic recombination is initiated by DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) occurring in micrococcal nuclease (MNase)-hypersensitive regions of the chromatin. MNase-sensitive sites also undergo meiosis-specific alterations in chromatin structure prior to the appearance of DSBs. DSB formation requires the products of numerous genes. Herein we have examined the effects of mutations in four such genes, MRE11, RAD50, XRS2, and MRE2, on MNase sensitivity at DSB sites in premeiotic and meiotic cells. Disruption mutations in each of four genes confer greater than wild-type levels of MNase sensitivity in premeiotic cells. In meiotic prophase, all of these mutations affect MNase sensitivity at DSB sites and fall into two distinct phenotypic classes. The type 1 mutations (mre2 and mre11) confer a reduction in MNase sensitivity relative to the wild-type level. The type 2 mutations (rad50 and xrs2) permit a meiotic increase in the MNase sensitivity to reach a final level higher than that observed in wild-type cells. An mre11 disruption mutation (type 1) is epistatic to a rad50 null mutation (type 2) with respect to its meiotic effects on MNase sensitivity, suggesting that the events observed in the type 2 mutants during meiosis are dependent upon type 1 functions. One interpretation of these results is that Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2, and possibly Mer2 (whose splicing is Mre2-dependent) form a complex at recombination hot spots and establish a chromatin/DNA configuration favorable for the induction of DSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9435246      PMCID: PMC18474          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  The sbcC and sbcD genes of Escherichia coli encode a nuclease involved in palindrome inviability and genetic recombination.

Authors:  J C Connelly; D R Leach
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Meiotic recombination hotspots.

Authors:  M Lichten; A S Goldman
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family.

Authors:  S Keeney; C N Giroux; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Relationship between nuclease-hypersensitive sites and meiotic recombination hot spot activity at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Q Q Fan; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Meiosis: how could it work?

Authors:  N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Competition between adjacent meiotic recombination hotspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Q Q Fan; F Xu; M A White; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Human Rad50 is physically associated with human Mre11: identification of a conserved multiprotein complex implicated in recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  G M Dolganov; R S Maser; A Novikov; L Tosto; S Chong; D A Bressan; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Double strand breaks at the HIS2 recombination hot spot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  S A Bullard; S Kim; A M Galbraith; R E Malone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  RAD50 protein of S.cerevisiae exhibits ATP-dependent DNA binding.

Authors:  W E Raymond; N Kleckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Physical detection of heteroduplexes during meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D K Nag; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  36 in total

1.  Coordination of the initiation of recombination and the reductional division in meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Jiao; S A Bullard; L Salem; R E Malone
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The roles of mutS, sbcCD and recA in the propagation of TGG repeats in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  X Pan; D R Leach
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Counteracting regulation of chromatin remodeling at a fission yeast cAMP response element-related recombination hotspot by stress-activated protein kinase, cAMP-dependent kinase and meiosis regulators.

Authors:  K Mizuno; T Hasemi; T Ubukata; T Yamada; E Lehmann; J Kohli; Y Watanabe; Y Iino; M Yamamoto; M E Fox; G R Smith; H Murofushi; T Shibata; K Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Finding the crosswalks on DNA.

Authors:  Clifford F Weil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mre11 complex and DNA replication: linkage to E2F and sites of DNA synthesis.

Authors:  R S Maser; O K Mirzoeva; J Wells; H Olivares; B R Williams; R A Zinkel; P J Farnham; J H Petrini
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Investigation of the mechanism of meiotic DNA cleavage by VMA1-derived endonuclease uncovers a meiotic alteration in chromatin structure around the target site.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Fukuda; Kunihiro Ohta; Yoshikazu Ohya
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-06

7.  Conditional genomic rearrangement by designed meiotic recombination using VDE (PI-SceI) in yeast.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Fukuda; Yoshikazu Ohya; Kunihiro Ohta
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Cytological analysis of MRE11 protein during early meiotic prophase I in Arabidopsis and tomato.

Authors:  Leslie D Lohmiller; Arnaud De Muyt; Brittany Howard; Hildo H Offenberg; Christa Heyting; Mathilde Grelon; Lorinda K Anderson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 9.  The Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene and its role in genome stability.

Authors:  Kenta Iijima; Kenshi Komatsu; Shinya Matsuura; Hiroshi Tauchi
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination.

Authors:  M Furuse; Y Nagase; H Tsubouchi; K Murakami-Murofushi; T Shibata; K Ohta
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-11-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.