Literature DB >> 9431336

Gender and communication style in general practice. Differences between women's health care and regular health care.

A van den Brink-Muinen1, J M Bensing, J J Kerssens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Differences were investigated between general practitioners providing women's health care (4 women) and general practitioners providing regular health care (8 women and 8 men). Expectations were formulated on the basis of the principles of women's health care and literature about gender differences.
METHODS: Data were used from 405 videotaped consultations of female patients (over 15 years). Roter's Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) was used to measure the verbal affective and instrumental behavior of the doctors and their patients. These data were supplemented by various nonverbal measures. The data were analyzed by means of multilevel analysis.
RESULTS: Doctors in the women's health care practice (called Aletta) look at their patients and talk with them more than other doctors. The general practitioners have approximately the same affective behavior, but the Aletta doctors show more verbal attentiveness and warmth. They also give more medical information and advice. Most of the characteristics of Aletta doctors fit female doctors providing regular health care too. Male doctors show a less communicative behavior in most respects. The differences between general practitioners are reflected in their patients' communication style.
CONCLUSIONS: The integration into regular care of some aspects of doctor-patient communication that were found in women's health care might be desirable in the light of the further improvement of the quality of care for women and men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9431336     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Association between teenage pregnancy rates and the age and sex of general practitioners: cross sectional survey in Trent 1994-7.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; J Allen; M Pringle; D Ebdon; M McPhearson; D Churchill; S Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

2.  Gender and performance of community treatment assistants in Tanzania.

Authors:  Alexander Jenson; Catherine Gracewello; Harran Mkocha; Debra Roter; Beatriz Munoz; Sheila West
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Efficacy of influenza vaccine among elderly patients by physical activity status.

Authors:  Yuichi Hara; Akihito Hagihara; Hideyuki Ikematu; Koichi Nobutomo
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Patient satisfaction in women's clinics versus traditional primary care clinics in the Veterans Administration.

Authors:  Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry; Chung-Chou H Chang; Melissa A McNeil; Jeff Whittle; Patricia M Hayes; Sarah Hudson Scholle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Are health care professionals able to judge cancer patients' health care preferences correctly? A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients.

Authors:  Jozien M Bensing; Fred Tromp; Sandra van Dulmen; Atie van den Brink-Muinen; William Verheul; François G Schellevis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Interpersonal behaviors and socioemotional interaction of medical students in a virtual clinical encounter.

Authors:  Olivier Courteille; Anna Josephson; Lars-Olof Larsson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.