Literature DB >> 9426799

Attentional bias in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers.

B H Johnsen1, J F Thayer, J C Laberg, A E Asbjornsen.   

Abstract

Attentional bias was studied with a modified version of the Stroop test in active smokers, abstinent smokers, and nonsmokers. The task was color-naming of incongruent color-words, smoking-related words, and neutral words. The results showed that the active smokers used longer verbal reaction time (VRT) to smoking-related words compared to abstinent smokers, i.e., indicating stronger attentional bias in the active smokers. Furthermore, longer VRTs to the Stroop words compared to the smoking words and the neutral words were found only in nonsmokers and abstinent smokers. Finally, a significant negative correlation was found between attitudes against smoking and VRTs to the smoking-related words. Taken together the main finding was that the active smokers showed no differential response to the stimuli. This could be caused by a lack of ability to modulate attentional processes in active smokers.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9426799     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(97)00010-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  9 in total

1.  Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers.

Authors:  J M Wertz; M A Sayette
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2001-09

2.  Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Matt Field; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  A double-blind placebo controlled experimental study of nicotine: I--effects on incentive motivation.

Authors:  Lynne Dawkins; Jane H Powell; Robert West; John Powell; Alan Pickering
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effects of cigarette smoking and abstinence on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Catherine P Domier; John R Monterosso; Arthur L Brody; Sara L Simon; Adrianna Mendrek; Richard Olmstead; Murray E Jarvik; Mark S Cohen; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Human nicotine conditioning requires explicit contingency knowledge: is addictive behaviour cognitively mediated?

Authors:  Lee Hogarth; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The motivational salience of cigarette-related stimuli among former, never, and current smokers.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Aurelija Slapin; Robert Oum; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.157

7.  Cigarette cues capture smokers' attention: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Francesco Versace; Jason D Robinson; Cho Y Lam; Jennifer A Minnix; Victoria L Brown; Brian L Carter; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Networked collective intelligence improves dissemination of scientific information regarding smoking risks.

Authors:  Douglas Guilbeault; Damon Centola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Response inhibition of cigarette-related cues in male light smokers: behavioral evidence using a two-choice oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Zhao Xin; Liu X Ting; Zan X Yi; Dai Li; Zhou A Bao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.