Literature DB >> 20665723

Dynamic upper and lower visual field preferences within the human dorsal frontoparietal attention network.

Antje Kraft1, Wieland H Sommer, Sein Schmidt, Stephan A Brandt.   

Abstract

Both in nonhuman primates and in humans, behavioral differences between the upper and lower visual field have been identified in distinct subprocesses of attention. Advantages of the lower field have been explained by its higher spatial resolution; those of the upper field by its higher efficiency in attentional shifting. The physiological basis of visual field asymmetries within in the frontoparietal attention network (FPN) remains unclear. This study investigates the physiological correlates of upper and lower field preferences within the FPN using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. The paradigm separated two attentional subprocesses during a visual search task. Whether in the upper or lower field, the attention of subjects was first directed at stationary locations (spatial orienting) and then shifted between locations to search for a target (visual search) in easy or difficult search displays. Depending on the task phase (spatial orienting vs. easy visual search), upper and lower visual field preferences in the FPN changed. The analysis revealed a lower field preference during stationary spatial orienting and an upper field preference during visual search. We conclude that also higher areas represent upper and lower visual field asymmetries depending on distinct subcomponents of visuospatial attentional processing.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665723      PMCID: PMC6870500          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  59 in total

1.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The functional neuroanatomy of visual conjunction search: a parametric fMRI study.

Authors:  Notger G Müller; Tobias H Donner; Oliver A Bartelt; Stephan A Brandt; Arno Villringer; Andreas Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.

Authors:  Peter Malinowski; Sandra Fuchs; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Cortical mechanisms for shifting and holding visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Todd A Kelley; John T Serences; Barry Giesbrecht; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Topographic organization for delayed saccades in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Denis Schluppeck; Paul Glimcher; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The neuropsychology of 3-D space.

Authors:  F H Previc
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lateralized Suppression of Alpha-Band EEG Activity As a Mechanism of Target Processing.

Authors:  Felix Bacigalupo; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Face-sex categorization is better above fixation than below: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  Are Categorical Spatial Relations Encoded by Shifting Visual Attention between Objects?

Authors:  Lei Yuan; David Uttal; Steven Franconeri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parcellation-based tractographic modeling of the dorsal attention network.

Authors:  Parker G Allan; Robert G Briggs; Andrew K Conner; Christen M O'Neal; Phillip A Bonney; Brian D Maxwell; Cordell M Baker; Joshua D Burks; Goksel Sali; Chad A Glenn; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Visual Timing of Structured Dance Movements Resembles Auditory Rhythm Perception.

Authors:  Yi-Huang Su; Elvira Salazar-López
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  Inverting the Facing-the-Viewer Bias for Biological Motion Stimuli.

Authors:  Séamas Weech; Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-01-09

7.  Lower visual field preference for the visuomotor control of limb movements in the human dorsomedial parietal cortex.

Authors:  Teresa Maltempo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Martina Bellagamba; Sara Di Marco; Patrizia Fattori; Gaspare Galati; Claudio Galletti; Valentina Sulpizio
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.270

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.