Literature DB >> 9424616

[Value of contrast medium magnetic resonance tomography of the breast in breast reconstruction with implant].

A Heinig1, S H Heywang-Köbrunner, P Viehweg, D Lampe, J Buchmann, R P Spielmann.   

Abstract

Early recognition of recurrence and work-up of clinically indeterminate lesions may be impaired after reconstruction with silicone implants due to superimposition of the implant or to scarring. This study was undertaken to evaluate the use of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with silicone implant after breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced MRI was offered to 169 patients. Comparative two- to three-view mammography was also performed in 169 patients, as well as comparative sonography in 144 patients. Conventional imaging and clinical examination detected only 8/13 recurrences, whereas 12/13 were detected by MRI. One recurrence had been visible as a strongly enhancing 2-mm dot in a previous examination (2 years before), but was not called. It was therefore counted as false negative. In addition, multicentricity was detected by MRI alone in two of three cases. MRI correctly diagnosed scar tissue in all cases with indeterminate findings. However, due to false-positive calls caused by enhancing granulomas specificity could not be improved. Contrast-enhanced MRI allowed decisive additional information in our study group and improved the sensitivity significantly (concerning all diagnoses). Contrast-enhanced MRI is recommended in patients with diagnostic problems or high risk of recurrence after silicone implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9424616     DOI: 10.1007/s001170050272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  3 in total

1.  [Clip marker placement following MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast].

Authors:  C Perlet; H Sittek; M Reiser; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Interventional MRI of the breast. Indications, technique, results and perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff; T Schlossbauer; P Herzog; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Breast cancer. Sonography and magnetic resonance mammography].

Authors:  S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.