Literature DB >> 9423610

Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.

P Skaane1, K Engedal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictive power of sonographic tumor descriptors in the differentiation of fibroadenoma from invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Three hundred thirty-six tumors (142 fibroadenomas and 194 invasive ductal carcinomas) of the breast diagnosed using sonography were prospectively recorded with respect to the shape, contour, echo texture, echogenicity, sound transmission, and surrounding tissue of the tumors. Evaluation included odds and odds ratios of single sonographic features as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of combinations of features. Tumor descriptors were also evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age and clinical examination.
RESULTS: Irregular shape and contour, extensive hypoechogenicity, shadowing, echogenic halo, and distortion of surrounding tissue were the findings with the highest predictive value of malignancy. A thin echogenic pseudocapsule was the most important sonographic finding predictive of the benign nature of a solid mass. Echo texture was of little value in the differentiation of breast tumors. Age and clinical examination remained important predictors in a clinically referred patient population because a palpable mass in an elderly patient is most likely a carcinoma. We saw considerable overlap of most sonographic features in both benign and malignant tumors. However, using strict sonographic criteria and a combination of descriptors, we found a negative predictive value of 100% in palpable and 96% in impalpable tumors.
CONCLUSION: A combination of tumor descriptors gave negative predictive values approaching 100%, allowing downgrading of solid breast masses with a high degree of confidence. Extensive sonographic features analysis in patients with indeterminate clinical and mammographic findings has the potential for downgrading a tumor and possibly obviating the need for excision in a subgroup of patients. Further investigations may provide standardization of sonographic descriptor analysis and establishment of the combination of the most predictive features that would be useful in daily practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9423610     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  [3D ultrasound (3D US) in the diagnosis of focal breast lesions].

Authors:  D Kotsianos; S Wirth; T Fischer; K Hiltawsky; H Sittek; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.

Authors:  Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie; Chintana Paramagul; Janet Bailey; Alexis V Nees; Caroline Blane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Level set contouring for breast tumor in sonography.

Authors:  Yu-Len Huang; Yu-Ru Jiang; Dar-Ren Chen; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification.

Authors:  M Costantini; P Belli; C Ierardi; G Franceschini; G La Torre; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Shear strain imaging using shear deformations.

Authors:  Min Rao; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Jingfeng Jiang; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  The role of ultrasonographic findings to predict molecular subtype, histologic grade, and hormone receptor status of breast cancer.

Authors:  Filiz Çelebi; Kezban Nur Pilancı; Çetin Ordu; Filiz Ağacayak; Gül Alço; Serkan İlgün; Dauren Sarsenov; Zeynep Erdoğan; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  B-mode ultrasound examination of canine mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter < 2 cm).

Authors:  Iacopo Vannozzi; Matteo Tesi; Marta Zangheri; Viola Maria Innocenti; Alessandra Rota; Simonetta Citi; Alessandro Poli
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  Benign breast lesions: Ultrasound.

Authors:  N Masciadri; C Ferranti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-04-20

Review 10.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.