Literature DB >> 29541992

B-mode ultrasound examination of canine mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter < 2 cm).

Iacopo Vannozzi1, Matteo Tesi2, Marta Zangheri1, Viola Maria Innocenti3, Alessandra Rota1, Simonetta Citi1, Alessandro Poli1.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography is a valuable tool for the evaluation of neoplastic lesions in the dog and there is a growing interest in the use of this technique for the stadiation of canine mammary tumours. An accurate assessment of small sized nodules facilitates the stadiation of the mammary lesions and helps the clinician in the choice of the most indicated surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to identify those ultrasound criteria that may be useful in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions of small size (diameter smaller than 2 cm). Sixty-two nodules, < 2 cm in larger diameter, belonging to thirty-five bitches presented between January 2012 and February 2014 were evaluated. Tumours were observed by conventional ultrasound and assessed for: shape (regular-irregular), limit (defined-ill-defined), margins (regular-irregular), echogenicity (hypoechoic-isoechoic-hyperecoic), echotexture (homogeneus-heterogeneus), presence of hyperecoic halo, distal acoustic enhancement or shadowing and surrounding tissue alterations. Among the alterations in surrounding tissues, the disruption of the glandular tissue and the increase in echogenicity of the peritumoral tissues were assessed. Thereafter, bitches were subjected to mastectomy and nodules were evaluated histologically. None of the ultasound criteria considered in the current study showed a statistically significant relation with malignancy, except for the presence of alterations in the tissue surrounding the nodules. According to our results, this characteristic may indicate malignancy, however its subjectivity may affect the applicability in clinical practice. In conclusions, conventional ultrasound in bitches had a limited ability in discriminating benign and malignant mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter < 2 cm).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine; Dog; Image analysis; Mammary tumours; Ultrasound; Ultrasound criteria

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29541992     DOI: 10.1007/s11259-018-9716-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Res Commun        ISSN: 0165-7380            Impact factor:   2.459


  28 in total

1.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  H M Zonderland; E G Coerkamp; J Hermans; M J van de Vijver; A E van Voorthuisen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Effect of spaying and timing of spaying on survival of dogs with mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  K U Sorenmo; F S Shofer; M H Goldschmidt
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Sonoelastography for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Bo La Yun; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Canine mammary tumours as a model to study human breast cancer: most recent findings.

Authors:  Felisbina Luisa Queiroga; Teresa Raposo; Maria Isabel Carvalho; Justina Prada; Isabel Pires
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Prognostic factors in canine mammary tumors.

Authors:  I D Kurzman; S R Gilbertson
Journal:  Semin Vet Med Surg (Small Anim)       Date:  1986-02

6.  Survey of animal neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. II. Cancer morbidity in dogs and cats from Alameda County.

Authors:  C R Dorn; D O Taylor; R Schneider; H H Hibbard; M R Klauber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Canine mammary tumours, an overview.

Authors:  N Sleeckx; H de Rooster; E J B Veldhuis Kroeze; C Van Ginneken; L Van Brantegem
Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 2.005

8.  Spontaneous mammary intraepithelial lesions in dogs--a model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Elisabetta Antuofermo; Margaret A Miller; Salvatore Pirino; Jun Xie; Sunil Badve; Sulma I Mohammed
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Influence of host factors on survival in dogs with malignant mammary gland tumors.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Philibert; Paul W Snyder; Nita Glickman; Larry T Glickman; Deborah W Knapp; David J Waters
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of depth-width ratio (D/W) of benign and malignant mammary tumors in dogs.

Authors:  Michihito Tagawa; Eiichi Kanai; Genya Shimbo; Mikiya Kano; Hideki Kayanuma
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 1.267

View more
  2 in total

1.  Strain and Shear-Wave Elastography and Their Relationship to Histopathological Features of Canine Mammary Nodular Lesions.

Authors:  Marcella Massimini; Alessia Gloria; Mariarita Romanucci; Leonardo Della Salda; Lucia Di Francesco; Alberto Contri
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-15

2.  Comparison between Histological Features and Strain Elastographic Characteristics in Canine Mammary Carcinomas.

Authors:  Nieves Pastor; Lorena Espadas; Massimo Santella; Luis Javier Ezquerra; Raquel Tarazona; María Esther Durán
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.