Literature DB >> 9421569

Evaluating characteristics of false memories: remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.

M Mather1, L A Henkel, M K Johnson.   

Abstract

Subjects hearing a list of associates to a nonpresented lure word later often claim to have heard the lure (Deese, 1959; Roediger & McDermott, 1995). To examine the characteristics of such false memories, subjects completed a memory characteristics questionnaire (MCQ; Johnson, Foley, Suengas, & Raye, 1988) or made remember/know (RK; Gardiner & Java, 1993) judgments for previously heard theme associates and nonpresented lures. MCQ ratings indicated that false memories for lures had less auditory detail and less remembered feelings and reactions than memories for presented words. In addition, rates of false recognition for lures were significantly lower than rates of correct recognition when items from various themes were intermixed instead of blocked at acquisition and subjects made MCQ ratings instead of RK judgments. This demonstrates that false memories can be affected both by how they are acquired and by how extensively they are examined at retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9421569     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211327

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.

Authors:  M S Zaragoza; J W Koshmider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  From a passing thought to a false memory in 2 minutes: Confusing real and illusory events.

Authors:  J D Read
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-03

3.  Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects.

Authors:  L A Henkel; N Franklin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

4.  False recognition in younger and older adults: exploring the characteristics of illusory memories.

Authors:  K A Norman; D L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

5.  The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source.

Authors:  D S Lindsay; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-05

6.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

Authors:  M K Johnson; M A Foley; A G Suengas; C L Raye
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory.

Authors:  M S Zaragoza; S M Lane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The malleability of human memory.

Authors:  E F Loftus
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.548

10.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09
View more
  57 in total

1.  Can medial temporal lobe regions distinguish true from false? An event-related functional MRI study of veridical and illusory recognition memory.

Authors:  R Cabeza; S M Rao; A D Wagner; A R Mayer; D L Schacter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effects of a levels-of-processing manipulation on false recall.

Authors:  M G Rhodes; J S Anastasi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: false recognition and remember/know judgments.

Authors:  W P Wallace; C P Malone; A D Spoo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

4.  Factors that determine false recall: a multiple regression analysis.

Authors:  H L Roediger; J M Watson; K B McDermott; D A Gallo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

5.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

Authors:  A Thapar; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

6.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

7.  Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories.

Authors:  Jason L Hicks; Thomas W Hancock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

8.  The reliability of the DRM paradigm as a measure of individual differences in false memories.

Authors:  Irene V Blair; Alison P Lenton; Reid Hastie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

9.  Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories.

Authors:  David C Rubin; Robert W Schrauf; Daniel L Greenberg
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-09

10.  Phenomenal characteristics of guided imagery, natural imagery, and autobiographical memories.

Authors:  Katherine D Arbuthnott; Carla B Geelen; Kinda L K Kealy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.