Literature DB >> 10780029

Implicit word activation during prerecognition processing: false recognition and remember/know judgments.

W P Wallace1, C P Malone, A D Spoo.   

Abstract

Recognition memory for spoken words is influenced by phonetic resemblance between test words and items presented during study. Presentation of derived nonwords (e.g., /d/ransparent or transparen/d/) on a study list produces a higher than normal false recognition rate to base words (e.g., transparent). Test words that share beginning phonemes with studied nonwords have more false recognitions than do those that share ending phonemes. The latter difference has been attributed to familiarity resulting from prerecognition processing of spoken stimuli. As a listener hears/traens/, "transparent" may be activated as a potential solution. In the present experiments, we minimized contributions of postrecognition processing to this phenomenon by presenting a semantically unrelated test word (transportation) that was also expected to be activated during prerecognition stages of processing. The results indicated that false recognition was increased for words presumed to be activated only during prerecognition processing. Remember (R) and know (K) judgments revealed that the majority of studied words were R, and the majority of false recognitions were K. The lowest proportion of R judgments occurred for test words that were not activated during postrecognition processing (e.g., transportation and control words).

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780029     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Measuring recognition memory.

Authors:  W Donaldson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1992-09

2.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

3.  Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task.

Authors:  B van Ooijen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-09

4.  Are false recognitions influenced by prerecognition processing?

Authors:  W P Wallace; M T Stewart; T R Shaffer; J A Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.

Authors:  P Zwitserlood
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-06

6.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

7.  False positives in recognition memory produced by cohort activation.

Authors:  W P Wallace; M T Stewart; H L Sherman; M D Mellor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-04

8.  Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.

Authors:  S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

9.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

10.  The structure of the initial cohort: evidence from gating.

Authors:  L K Tyler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  W P Wallace; T R Shaffer; M D Amberg; V L Silvers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

2.  Familiarity from orthographic information: extensions of the recognition without identification effect.

Authors:  Marianne E Lloyd; Deanne L Westerman; Jeremy K Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

3.  Recollection rejection: gist cuing of verbatim memory.

Authors:  Timothy N Odegard; James M Lampinen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

4.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on specific and gist-based associative episodic memory.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Greene; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.