Literature DB >> 9419534

Observer performance comparison of digital radiograph systems for stereotactic breast needle biopsy.

E A Krupinski1, H Roehrig, T Yu.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Two digital radiograph systems for stereotactic mammography, one using a lens to couple a Lanex Regular screen to a back-illuminated charge-coupled device (CCD) and one using a fiber-optic taper to couple a Min-R Regular-type screen to a front-illuminated CCD, were evaluated with respect to observer performance.
METHODS: A contrast-detail phantom was imaged in a variety of equivalent exposure conditions on both systems. Six observers viewed images on a video monitor and recorded which objects were detected.
RESULTS: Performance (percent correct detections) with the lens-coupled system using the Lanex Regular screen was significantly higher than with the fiber-optic-coupled system using the Min-R Regular-type screen.
CONCLUSION: Differences in absorption efficiencies of phosphors used, as well as differences in design of the two cameras, can explain differences in observer detection performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9419534     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(05)80144-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  4 in total

1.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of a contrast-detail-based method for electronic image display quality evaluation.

Authors:  N J Hangiandreou; K A Fetterly; J P Felmlee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Quantitative evaluation of overall electronic display quality.

Authors:  N J Hangiandreou; K A Fetterly; S N Bernatz; L J Cesar; D S Groth; J P Felmlee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  H Roehrig; T Yu; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.