Literature DB >> 9418710

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis increases the implantation rate in human in vitro fertilization by avoiding the transfer of chromosomally abnormal embryos.

L Gianaroli1, M C Magli, A P Ferraretti, A Fiorentino, J Garrisi, S Munné.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To verify the percentage of chromosomally abnormal preimplantation embryos in patients with a poor prognosis and possibly to increase the chance of implantation by selecting chromosomally normal embryos.
DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: In vitro fertilization program at the Reproductive Medicine Unit of the Società Italiana Studi Medicina della Riproduzione, Bologna, Italy. PATIENT(S): In a total of 28 stimulated cycles, the maternal age was > or = 38 years and/or the patient had > or = 3 previous IVF failures, factors that indicated a poor prognosis. After consent, 11 patients underwent preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy, whereas 17 controls underwent assisted zona hatching. INTERVENTION(S): Simultaneous analysis of chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 in a blastomere biopsied from day-3 embryos. Chromosomal analysis was performed with fluorescence in situ hybridization. Assisted zona hatching was performed on day-3 embryos from the control-group patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo morphology, results of fluorescence in situ hybridization, clinical pregnancies, and implantation. RESULT(S): In the study group, a total of 61 embryos were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, and 55% were chromosomally abnormal. Embryo transfer with at least one normal embryo was performed in 10 cycles. Four clinical pregnancies resulted, with a 28.0% implantation rate. In the control group, 41 embryos were transferred in 17 cycles after the assisted zona hatching procedure, yielding four clinical pregnancies and an 11.9% implantation rate. CONCLUSION(S): Infertile patients classified as having a poor prognosis have a high percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos. The advantage of selecting and transferring embryos with normal fluorescence in situ hybridization results has an immediate impact on implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9418710     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00412-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

Review 1.  Tenth anniversary of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization using 13-, 16-, 18-, 21-, 22-, X-, and Y-chromosome probes.

Authors:  Y Sasabe; K P Katayama; T Nishimura; A Takahashi; H Asakura; K Winchester-Peden; L Wise; Y Abe; H Kubo; S Hirakawa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Ethical considerations on indications for gender selection in Japan.

Authors:  Takahide Mori; Hirohiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Advantages of day 4 embryo transfer in patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.

Authors:  L Gianaroli; M C Magli; S Munné; D Fortini; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The impact of pronuclear orientation to select chromosomally normal embryos.

Authors:  Edson Júnior Borges; Lia Mara Rossi; Leila Farah; Patricia Guilherme; Claudia C Rocha; Valdemar Ortiz; Assumpto Júnior Iaconelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Jihoon Kim; John D Biggers
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients.

Authors:  M C Magli; L Gianaroli; S Munné; A P Ferraretti
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Pregnancy and child developmental outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening: a meta-analytic and systematic review.

Authors:  Misaki N Natsuaki; Laura M Dimler
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.764

Review 9.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Does reducing gamete co-incubation time improve clinical outcomes: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Rui-Qi Li; Neng-Yong Ouyang; Song-Bang Ou; Ren-Min Ni; Mei-Qi Mai; Qing-Xue Zhang; Dong-Zi Yang; Wen-Jun Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.