Literature DB >> 18936482

Hindwings are unnecessary for flight but essential for execution of normal evasive flight in Lepidoptera.

Benjamin Jantzen1, Thomas Eisner.   

Abstract

In Lepidoptera, forewings and hindwings are mechanically coupled and flap in synchrony. Flight is anteromotoric, being driven primarily by action of the forewings. Here we report that lepidopterans can still fly when their hindwings are cut off, a procedure reducing their total wing surface, on average, by nearly one half. However, as we demonstrate by analysis of three-dimensional flight trajectories of a moth and a butterfly (Lymantria dispar and Pieris rapae), hindwing removal causes lepidopterans to incur a loss in both linear and turning acceleration, so that they are unable to exercise their normal flight maneuverability. Without hindwings they still are able to zigzag aerially (the ablation has no effect on their turning radius in flight) but at lesser speed and therefore less evasively. Consequently, hindwings in the expanded state in which they occur in lepidopterans seem to contribute in an essential way to lepidopteran survival. Moths in today's world, we argue, may rely on their evasive flight primarily to avoid capture by bats, whereas butterflies, which we propose advertise their evasiveness collectively through shared aposematism, may depend upon it primarily for defense against birds. Aerial agility thus may be the chief adaptive asset derived by lepidopterans from possession of oversize hindwings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18936482      PMCID: PMC2575472          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807223105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  5 in total

1.  Take-off performance under optimal and suboptimal thermal conditions in the butterfly Pararge aegeria.

Authors:  Koen Berwaerts; Hans Van Dyck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability.

Authors:  H C Howland
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Sexual dimorphism in the visual system of flies: the divided brain of male Bibionidae (Diptera).

Authors:  J Zeil
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  Dynamics of animal movement in an ecological context: dragonfly wing damage reduces flight performance and predation success.

Authors:  S A Combes; J D Crall; S Mukherjee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Did Adult Diurnal Activity Influence the Evolution of Wing Morphology in Opoptera Butterflies?

Authors:  C M Penz; K B Heine
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.434

3.  Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots.

Authors:  Alejandro Ortega Ancel; Rodney Eastwood; Daniel Vogt; Carter Ithier; Michael Smith; Rob Wood; Mirko Kovač
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Role of side-slip flight in target pursuit: blue-tailed damselflies (Ischnura elegans) avoid body rotation while approaching a moving perch.

Authors:  Ziv Kassner; Gal Ribak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Moth tails divert bat attack: evolution of acoustic deflection.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Brian C Leavell; Adam L Keener; Jesse W Breinholt; Brad A Chadwell; Christopher J W McClure; Geena M Hill; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Predation favours Bicyclus anynana butterflies with fewer forewing eyespots.

Authors:  Ian Z W Chan; Zhe Ching Ngan; Lin Naing; Yueying Lee; V Gowri; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Wing shape allometry and aerodynamics in calopterygid damselflies: a comparative approach.

Authors:  David Outomuro; Dean C Adams; Frank Johansson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Flight Muscle and Wing Mechanical Properties are Involved in Flightlessness of the Domestic Silkmoth, Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Kunpeng Lu; Shubo Liang; Minjin Han; Chunman Wu; Jiangbo Song; Chunlin Li; Songyuan Wu; Songzhen He; Jianyu Ren; Hai Hu; Jianghong Shen; Xiaoling Tong; Fangyin Dai
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.