Literature DB >> 9415365

Similar mechanisms underlie simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction.

B Blakeslee1, M E McCourt.   

Abstract

The experiments explore whether the mechanism(s) underlying grating induction (GI) can also account for simultaneous brightness contrast (SBC). At each of three test field heights (1, 3 and 6 deg), point-by-point brightness matches were obtained from two subjects for test field widths of 32 deg (GI condition), 14, 12, 8, 6, 3 and 1 deg. The point-by-point brightness matches were quantitatively compared, using GI condition matches as a standard, to assess systematic alterations in the structure and average magnitude of brightness and darkness induction within the test fields as a function of changing test field height and width. In the wider test fields induction structure was present and was generally well-accounted for by the GI condition sinewave predictions. As test field width decreased the sinewave amplitude of the induced structure in the test field decreased (i.e., flattened), and eventually became negative (i.e., showed a reverse cusping) at the narrower test field widths. As expected, both subjects showed a decrease in overall levels of brightness and darkness induction with increasing test field height. For any particular test field height, however, relative brightness increased with decreasing test field width. This brightness increase began at larger test field widths as test field height increased. The results are parsimoniously accounted for by the output of a weighted, octave-interval array of seven difference-of-gaussian filters. This array of filters differs from those previously employed to model various aspects of spatial vision in that it includes filters tuned to much lower spatial frequencies. The two-dimensional output of this same array of filters also accounts for the GI demonstrations of Zaidi [(1989) Vision Research, 29, 691-697], Shapley and Reid's [(1985) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 82, 5983-5986] contrast and assimilation demonstration, and the induced spots seen at the street intersections of the Hermann Grid. The physiological plausibility of the filter array explanation of brightness induction is discussed, along with a consideration of its relationship to other models of brightness perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9415365     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00086-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Natural scene statistics as the universal basis of color context effects.

Authors:  Fuhui Long; Dale Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Nearly instantaneous brightness induction.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatiotemporal analysis of brightness induction.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Davis Cope; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

6.  Brightness induction magnitude declines with increasing distance from the inducing field edge.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  An exponential filter model predicts lightness illusions.

Authors:  Astrid Zeman; Kevin R Brooks; Sennay Ghebreab
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A temporal window for estimating surface brightness in the Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet effect.

Authors:  Ayako Masuda; Junji Watanabe; Masahiko Terao; Akihiro Yagi; Kazushi Maruya
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A neurodynamical model of brightness induction in v1.

Authors:  Olivier Penacchio; Xavier Otazu; Laura Dempere-Marco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effect of stimulus width on simultaneous contrast.

Authors:  Veronica Shi; Jie Cui; Xoana G Troncoso; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.