Literature DB >> 21763339

Spatiotemporal analysis of brightness induction.

Barbara Blakeslee1, Mark E McCourt.   

Abstract

Brightness induction refers to a class of visual illusions in which the perceived intensity of a region of space is influenced by the luminance of surrounding regions. These illusions are significant because they provide insight into the neural organization of the visual system. A novel quadrature-phase motion cancelation technique was developed to measure the magnitude of the grating induction brightness illusion across a wide range of spatial frequencies, temporal frequencies and test field heights. Canceling contrast is greatest at low frequencies and declines with increasing frequency in both dimensions, and with increasing test field height. Canceling contrast scales as the product of inducing grating spatial frequency and test field height (the number of inducing grating cycles per test field height). When plotted using a spatial axis which indexes this product, the spatiotemporal induction surfaces for four test field heights can be described as four partially overlapping sections of a single larger surface. These properties of brightness induction are explained in the context of multiscale spatial filtering. The present study is the first to measure the magnitude of grating induction as a function of temporal frequency. Taken in conjunction with several other studies (Blakeslee & McCourt, 2008; Magnussen & Glad, 1975; Robinson & de Sa, 2008) the results of this study illustrate that at least one form of brightness induction is very much faster than that reported by DeValois, Webster, DeValois, and Lingelbach (1986) and Rossi and Paradiso (1996), and are inconsistent with the proposition that brightness induction results from a slow "filling in" process.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21763339      PMCID: PMC3152653          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction.

Authors:  B Blakeslee; M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Temporal frequency characteristics of spatial interaction in human vision.

Authors:  S Magnussen; A Glad
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Natural image statistics mediate brightness 'filling in'.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  A multi-channel approach to brightness coding.

Authors:  F Kingdom; B Moulden
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Lightness, brightness and transparency: a quarter century of new ideas, captivating demonstrations and unrelenting controversy.

Authors:  Frederick A A Kingdom
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Temporal properties of brightness and color induction.

Authors:  R L De Valois; M A Webster; K K De Valois; B Lingelbach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Simultaneous contrast, filling-in process and information processing in man's visual system.

Authors:  H J Gerrits; A J Vendrik
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1970-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual grating induction.

Authors:  J M Foley; M E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect.

Authors:  M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  6 in total

1.  Filling in, filling out, or filtering out: processes stabilizing color appearance near the center of gaze.

Authors:  Sean F O'Neil; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Davis Cope; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

4.  Brightness induction magnitude declines with increasing distance from the inducing field edge.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Lightness induction enhancements and limitations at low frequency modulations across a variety of stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Louis Nicholas Vinke; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Kitaoka's Tomato: Two Simple Explanations Based on Information in the Stimulus.

Authors:  Arthur Shapiro; Laysa Hedjar; Erica Dixon; Akiyoshi Kitaoka
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-01-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.