Literature DB >> 25761392

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks.

Barbara Blakeslee1,2, Davis Cope3,2, Mark E McCourt4,5.   

Abstract

The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex visual stimuli; Model of brightness; Notebooks; ODOG model predictions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25761392      PMCID: PMC4567956          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  41 in total

Review 1.  An anchoring theory of lightness perception.

Authors:  A Gilchrist; C Kossyfidis; F Bonato; T Agostini; J Cataliotti; X Li; B Spehar; V Annan; E Economou
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction.

Authors:  B Blakeslee; M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Old wine in new bottles? Some thoughts on Logvinenko's "Lightness induction revisited".

Authors:  F Kingdom
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  A multiscale spatial filtering account of the Wertheimer-Benary effect and the corrugated Mondrian.

Authors:  B Blakeslee; M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A comment on the Anderson (1997), the Todorović (1997), and the Ross and Pessoa (2000) explanations of White's effect.

Authors:  P D Howe
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Does the bandpass linear filter response predict gradient lightness induction? A reply to Fred Kingdom.

Authors:  Alexander D Logvinenko
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Quantitative properties of achromatic color induction: an edge integration analysis.

Authors:  Michael E Rudd; Iris K Zemach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Modeling lateral geniculate nucleus response with contrast gain control. Part 2: analysis.

Authors:  Davis Cope; Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Lightness and retinex theory.

Authors:  E H Land; J J McCann
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-01
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Lynnette M Leone; Barbara Blakeslee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Mechanisms underlying simultaneous brightness contrast: Early and innate.

Authors:  Pawan Sinha; Sarah Crucilla; Tapan Gandhi; Dylan Rose; Amy Singh; Suma Ganesh; Umang Mathur; Peter Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  A model of lightness perception guided by probabilistic assumptions about lighting and reflectance.

Authors:  Richard F Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Lightness induction enhancements and limitations at low frequency modulations across a variety of stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Louis Nicholas Vinke; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Kitaoka's Tomato: Two Simple Explanations Based on Information in the Stimulus.

Authors:  Arthur Shapiro; Laysa Hedjar; Erica Dixon; Akiyoshi Kitaoka
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-01-08

7.  The perception threshold of the panda illusion, a particular form of 2D pulse-width-modulated halftone, correlates with visual acuity.

Authors:  Torsten Straßer; Anne Kurtenbach; Hana Langrová; Laura Kuehlewein; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.