Literature DB >> 9413938

Absence of mutations in the ATM gene in breast cancer patients with severe responses to radiotherapy.

J M Appleby1, J B Barber, E Levine, J M Varley, A M Taylor, T Stankovic, J Heighway, C Warren, D Scott.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of cancer radiotherapy is compromised by the small proportion (approximately 5%) of patients who sustain severe normal tissue damage after standard radiotherapy treatments. Predictive tests are required to identify these highly radiosensitive cases. Patients with the rare, recessively inherited, cancer-prone syndrome ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) sustain extremely severe normal tissue necrosis after radiotherapy and their cultured cells are also highly radiosensitive. Clinically normal carriers (heterozygotes) of the A-T gene have an increased risk of breast cancer, account for approximately 4% of all breast cancer cases and show a modest increase in cellular radiosensitivity in vitro. It has been suggested that a substantial proportion of highly radiosensitive (HR) breast cancer patients may be A-T heterozygotes, and that screening for mutations in the A-T gene could be used as a predictive test. We have tested this hypothesis in a group of cancer patients who showed adverse reactions to radiotherapy. Sixteen HR breast cancer patients showing mainly acute reactions (and seven HR patients with other cancers) were tested for ATM mutations using the restriction endonuclease fingerprinting assay. No mutations typical of those found in obligate A-T heterozygotes were detected. If the estimate that 4% of breast cancer cases are A-T gene carriers is correct, then ATM mutations do not confer clinical radiosensitivity. These early results suggest that screening for ATM mutations in cancer patients may not be of value in predicting adverse reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9413938      PMCID: PMC2228198          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  22 in total

1.  Radiation sensitive breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A Norman; K S Iwamoto; A R Kagan; M Wollin
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Ataxia telangiectasia: a human mutation with abnormal radiation sensitivity.

Authors:  A M Taylor; D G Harnden; C F Arlett; S A Harcourt; A R Lehmann; S Stevens; B A Bridges
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Intrinsic radiosensitivity as a predictor of patient response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  C M West; J H Hendry
Journal:  BJR Suppl       Date:  1992

4.  The importance of genetics for the optimization of radiation therapy. A hypothesis.

Authors:  A Norman; A R Kagan; S L Chan
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  The relationship between cellular radiation sensitivity and tissue response may provide the basis for individualising radiotherapy schedules.

Authors:  N G Burnet; J Nyman; I Turesson; R Wurm; J R Yarnold; J H Peacock
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  The Christie Hospital breast conservation trial: an update at 8 years from inception.

Authors:  G G Ribeiro; B Magee; R Swindell; M Harris; S S Banerjee
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Ataxia telangiectasia. Neoplasia, untoward response to x-irradiation, and tuberous sclerosis.

Authors:  S P Gotoff; E Amirmokri; E J Liebner
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1967-12

8.  The incidence and gene frequency of ataxia-telangiectasia in the United States.

Authors:  M Swift; D Morrell; E Cromartie; A R Chamberlin; M H Skolnick; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Response of dermal fibroblast cultures from patients with unusually severe responses to radiotherapy and from ataxia telangiectasia heterozygotes to fractionated radiation.

Authors:  W K DahlBerg; J B Little
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Abnormal radiosensitivity of lymphocytes from breast cancer patients with excessive normal tissue damage after radiotherapy: chromosome aberrations after low dose-rate irradiation.

Authors:  L A Jones; D Scott; R Cowan; S A Roberts
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.694

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenetics in the management of breast cancer -- prospects for individualised treatment.

Authors:  Fiona H Blackhall; Sacha Howell; Bill Newman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  DNA damage response and hematological malignancy.

Authors:  Masatoshi Takagi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 4.  ATM and genome maintenance: defining its role in breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Kum Kum Khanna; Georgia Chenevix-Trench
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the genes ATM, GSTP1, SOD2, TGFB1, XPD and XRCC1 with risk of severe erythema after breast conserving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Annette Raabe; Katharina Derda; Sebastian Reuther; Silke Szymczak; Kerstin Borgmann; Ulrike Hoeller; Andreas Ziegler; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  miR-18a impairs DNA damage response through downregulation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase.

Authors:  Libing Song; Chuyong Lin; Zhiqiang Wu; Hui Gong; Yong Zeng; Jueheng Wu; Mengfeng Li; Jun Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A bioinformatics filtering strategy for identifying radiation response biomarker candidates.

Authors:  Jung Hun Oh; Harry P Wong; Xiaowei Wang; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Radiation-hypersensitive cancer patients do not manifest protein expression abnormalities in components of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway.

Authors:  T Leong; M Chao; S Bassal; M McKay
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Aberrant CDKN1A transcriptional response associates with abnormal sensitivity to radiation treatment.

Authors:  C Badie; S Dziwura; C Raffy; T Tsigani; G Alsbeih; J Moody; P Finnon; E Levine; D Scott; S Bouffler
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Normal expression of DNA repair proteins, hMre11, Rad50 and Rad51 but protracted formation of Rad50 containing foci in X-irradiated skin fibroblasts from radiosensitive cancer patients.

Authors:  C Djuzenova; B Mühl; R Schakowski; U Oppitz; M Flentje
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.