Literature DB >> 7716263

The relationship between cellular radiation sensitivity and tissue response may provide the basis for individualising radiotherapy schedules.

N G Burnet1, J Nyman, I Turesson, R Wurm, J R Yarnold, J H Peacock.   

Abstract

There is a wide variation in normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy and in many situations the severity of these reactions limits radiotherapy dose. Clinical fractionation studies carried out in Gothenburg have demonstrated that a large part of the spectrum of normal tissue reactions is due to differences in individual normal tissue sensitivity. If this variation in normal tissue reactions is due to differences in intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity, it should be possible to predict tissue response based on measurement of cellular sensitivity. Here we report the initial results of a study aimed at establishing whether a direct relationship exists between cellular radiosensitivity and tissue response. Ten fibroblasts strains, including four duplicates, were established from a group of patients in the Gothenburg fractionation trials who had received radiotherapy following mastectomy. Skin doses were measured and both acute and late skin changes were observed following radiotherapy. Right and left parasternal areas were treated with different dose fractionation schedules. Clonogenic assays were used to assess intrinsic cellular radiosensitivity, and all experiments were carried out without prior knowledge of the clinical response, or which strains were duplicates. Irradiation was carried out using 60Co gamma-rays at high dose-rate (HDR) of 1-2 Gy/min and low dose-rate (LDR) of 1 cGy/min. A spectrum of sensitivity was seen, with SF2 values of 0.17-0.28 at HDR and 0.25-0.34 at LDR, and values of D0.01 of 5.07-6.38 Gy at HDR and 6.43-8.12 Gy at LDR. Comparison of the in vitro results with the clinical normal tissue effects shows a correlation between cellular sensitivity and late tissue reactions, which is highly significant with p = 0.02. A correlation between cellular sensitivity and acute effects was noted in the left-sided parasternal fields, but not the right. This is thought to be coincidental, and without biological significance. Our results suggest that cellular sensitivity might form the basis for the development of an assay system capable of predicting late normal tissue effects to curative radiotherapy, which might allow dose escalation in some patients. Increased local control and cure, with unchanged or improved normal tissue complications, could result from such individualised radiotherapy prescriptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7716263     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90358-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Genetic predisposition and radiation sensitivity of tumors].

Authors:  W Budach
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Investigating micronucleus assay applicability for prediction of normal tissue intrinsic radiosensitivity in gynecological cancer patients.

Authors:  Elitsa Encheva; Sofia Deleva; Rositsa Hristova; Valeria Hadjidekova; Tatiana Hadjieva
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-10-29

3.  [Genetic predisposition and radiation sensitivity of normal tissue].

Authors:  C Streffer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Defining molecular and cellular responses after low and high linear energy transfer radiations to develop biomarkers of carcinogenic risk or therapeutic outcome.

Authors:  Michael Story; Liang-hao Ding; William A Brock; K Kian Ang; Ghazi Alsbeih; John Minna; Seongmi Park; Amit Das
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Chromosomal in-vitro radiosensitivity of lymphocytes in radiotherapy patients and AT-homozygotes.

Authors:  J Dunst; S Neubauer; A Becker; E Gebhart
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Absence of mutations in the ATM gene in breast cancer patients with severe responses to radiotherapy.

Authors:  J M Appleby; J B Barber; E Levine; J M Varley; A M Taylor; T Stankovic; J Heighway; C Warren; D Scott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy: towards tailoring treatment dose by genotype.

Authors:  Gillian C Barnett; Catherine M L West; Alison M Dunning; Rebecca M Elliott; Charlotte E Coles; Paul D P Pharoah; Neil G Burnet
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  An optimized method for detecting gamma-H2AX in blood cells reveals a significant interindividual variation in the gamma-H2AX response among humans.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Tabasum Imran Wadhra; Ola Hammarsten
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Demonstration of increased collagen synthesis in irradiated human skin in vivo.

Authors:  P Autio; T Saarto; M Tenhunen; I Elomaa; J Risteli; T Lahtinen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.