Literature DB >> 3341275

The importance of genetics for the optimization of radiation therapy. A hypothesis.

A Norman1, A R Kagan, S L Chan.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that a fraction of cancer patients, perhaps as high as 15%, is radiation sensitive because of the action of specific genes. It seems likely that in the near future we shall be able to identify these patients by DNA probes. Therefore, we have calculated the impact on radiation therapy of removing these patients and treating the rest more aggressively. In particular, we assumed that the radiation oncologist will treat with an effective therapeutic dose corresponding to a 5% risk of serious normal tissue injury. Our results, in several instances, show a considerable increase in local control when the 5, 10, or 15% of the most radiosensitive patients are removed from the treated group. This is so, even if we assume that the tumor cells, as well as the normal cells, in radiosensitive patients are more radiosensitive than the tumor cells in patients of normal radiosensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3341275     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-198802000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  13 in total

Review 1.  Theory and practice of predictive assays in radiation therapy.

Authors:  N E Crompton; M Ozsahin; P Schweizer; B Larsson; U M Luetolf
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  DNA Supercoiling and Repair in Peripheral Lymphocytes as a Measure of Acute Radiation Response After Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Rosemann; Brigitte Schulze; Helmut Abel
Journal:  Radiat Oncol Investig       Date:  1994

3.  Prolonged expression of the γ-H2AX DNA repair biomarker correlates with excess acute and chronic toxicity from radiotherapy treatment.

Authors:  Emma C Bourton; Piers N Plowman; Daniel Smith; Colin F Arlett; Christopher N Parris
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Comparison between radiation-induced cell cycle delay in lymphocytes and radiotherapy response in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  R Tell; T Heiden; F Granath; A L Borg; S Skog; R Lewensohn
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Absence of mutations in the ATM gene in breast cancer patients with severe responses to radiotherapy.

Authors:  J M Appleby; J B Barber; E Levine; J M Varley; A M Taylor; T Stankovic; J Heighway; C Warren; D Scott
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Radiation-hypersensitive cancer patients do not manifest protein expression abnormalities in components of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway.

Authors:  T Leong; M Chao; S Bassal; M McKay
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the histone γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci.

Authors:  Cholpon S Djuzenova; Ines Elsner; Astrid Katzer; Eike Worschech; Luitpold V Distel; Michael Flentje; Bülent Polat
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Can the severity of normal tissue damage after radiation therapy be predicted?

Authors:  Adrian C Begg
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Normal expression of DNA repair proteins, hMre11, Rad50 and Rad51 but protracted formation of Rad50 containing foci in X-irradiated skin fibroblasts from radiosensitive cancer patients.

Authors:  C Djuzenova; B Mühl; R Schakowski; U Oppitz; M Flentje
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Radiosensitivity in breast cancer assessed by the Comet and micronucleus assays.

Authors:  C S Djuzenova; B Mühl; M Fehn; U Oppitz; B Müller; M Flentje
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.