Literature DB >> 9413774

Implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules by nurses working in an accident and emergency department.

P Salt1, M Clancy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether accident and emergency (A&E) nurses using the Ottawa Ankle Rules could detect all ankle fractures.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: A&E department of a university teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: All patients who presented with ankle injuries who were initially assessed by a nurse taught the Ottawa Ankle Rules. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) The numbers of patients referred by the nurse for ankle radiography; (2) of these, the number with ankle fractures; (3) of those not sent for radiography initially by the nurse, the number who subsequently had x rays (ordered by the doctor) and had a fracture; (4) of those having no x rays, the number who reattended later.
RESULTS: 324 patients were eligible; 238 had x rays at the request of the nurse (73%); 48 of these (20%) were diagnosed as having a fracture. Of those 86 patients not sent for radiography by the nurse, 19 subsequently had x ray examinations at the request of a doctor and no fracture was detected. Of the 67 not sent for radiography, none returned within the subsequent eight weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Nurses can apply the Ottawa Ankle Rules safely without missing acute fractures; that is, of those who were not sent for radiography by nurses, none subsequently reattended the A&E department or the trauma service of the Bristol Royal Infirmary during the following two months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9413774      PMCID: PMC1342974          DOI: 10.1136/emj.14.6.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med        ISSN: 1351-0622


  11 in total

1.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1992 emergency department summary.

Authors:  L F McCaig
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1994-03-02

2.  Guidelines for selective radiological assessment of inversion ankle injuries.

Authors:  M G Dunlop; T F Beattie; G K White; G M Raab; R I Doull
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-06

3.  Selective radiographic assessment of acute ankle injuries in the emergency department: barriers to implementation.

Authors:  S Lloyd
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department?

Authors:  D N Gleadhill; J Y Thomson; P Simms
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-11

5.  Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G H Greenberg; R D McKnight; R C Nair; I McDowell; M Reardon; J P Stewart; J Maloney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Interobserver agreement in the examination of acute ankle injury patients.

Authors:  I G Stiell; R D McKnight; G H Greenberg; R C Nair; I McDowell; G J Wallace
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

Authors:  I Stiell; G Wells; A Laupacis; R Brison; R Verbeek; K Vandemheen; C D Naylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

8.  A protocol for selecting patients with injured extremities who need x-rays.

Authors:  D A Brand; W H Frazier; W C Kohlhepp; K M Shea; A M Hoefer; M D Ecker; P J Kornguth; M J Pais; T R Light
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Use of radiography in acute ankle injuries: physicians' attitudes and practice.

Authors:  I G Stiell; I McDowell; R C Nair; H Aeta; G Greenberg; R D McKnight; J Ahuja
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  I G Stiell; R D McKnight; G H Greenberg; I McDowell; R C Nair; G A Wells; C Johns; J R Worthington
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  S Perry; N Raby; P T Grant
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

2.  Establishing an emergency nurse practitioner service.

Authors:  J Bache
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  John Heyworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

4.  Ottawa ankle rules for the injured ankle.

Authors:  J Heyworth
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  [The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].

Authors:  P Garcés; S Gurucharri; C Ibiricu; M Izuel; J Mozo; P Buil; J Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

6.  Accident and emergency medicine--the next 25 years.

Authors:  J Binchy
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

7.  A randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of double Tubigrip in grade 1 and 2 (mild to moderate) ankle sprains.

Authors:  B L Watts; B Armstrong
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

9.  Effect of a 4-week balance exercise with medio-lateral unstable sole on ankle joint functional ability.

Authors:  Su-Bin Nam; Bo-Ram Choi
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-07-15

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rule to exclude fractures in acute ankle injuries in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yolanda E Gomes; Minh Chau; Helen A Banwell; Ryan S Causby
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.