Literature DB >> 9412593

Cigarette promotional items in public schools.

J D Sargent1, M A Dalton, M Beach, A Bernhardt, D Pullin, M Stevens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of ownership of cigarette promotional items (CPIs) by rural northern New England students and to examine the association between CPI ownership and smoking behavior. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Voluntary, self-administered survey of 1265 sixth- through 12th-grade students representing 79% to 95% of all students attending 5 rural New Hampshire and Vermont public schools in October 1996. We examined the association between ownership of a CPI and smoking behavior through regression models and conducted a sensitivity analysis on the findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds of being a smoker (lifetime use of > or = 100 cigarettes) and, among never smokers and experimental smokers, adjusted cumulative odds of having higher levels of smoking uptake given CPI ownership.
RESULTS: One third of students owned a CPI. Prevalence of ownership did not vary by grade or sex, but was higher among poor-to-average school performers (45.0% vs 21.0% for excellent school performers, P < .001) and children whose friends and family members smoked (43.4% vs 13.8% for students with no family members or friends smoking, P < .001). Cigarette promotional items included articles of clothing (T-shirts, hats, backpacks, and jackets), smoking paraphernalia (lighters and ashtrays), camping gear, and electronics. More than half of CPIs (58.2%) bore the Marlboro logo, and almost one third (31.7%) bore the Camel logo. These items were obtained directly from catalogs or vendors 22.4% of the time. Whereas only 4.5% of students reported bringing a CPI to school with them the day of the survey, 44.5% reported seeing such an item at school the day of the survey. After controlling for confounding factors, such as having friends who smoke, students who owned CPIs were 4.1 times more likely to be smokers than those who did not own CPIs (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-5.5). Never and experimental smokers (n = 1008) who owned CPIs were more likely to be in a higher category on the smoking uptake index in grades 6 (cumulative odds ratio [OR = 5.7, 95% CI, 1.9-16.8), 7 (OR = 1.8, 95% CI, 0.9-3.7), 8 (OR = 2.3, 95% CI, 1.1-4.8), and 9 (OR = 2.1, 95% CI, 1.1-3.9), periods when children are most vulnerable to initiating cigarette use. A sensitivity analysis indicated that an unmeasured confounder of CPI ownership and smoking was unlikely to alter our conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette promotional items are owned by one third of students in these rural northern New England schools. These items are highly visible in the public school setting, and their ownership is strongly associated with initiation and maintenance of smoking behavior. These data lend support to a ban on CPIs to be included in US Food and Drug Administration regulations to prevent tobacco use among US youth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9412593     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170490015004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med        ISSN: 1072-4710


  10 in total

1.  Favourite movie stars, their tobacco use in contemporary movies, and its association with adolescent smoking.

Authors:  J J Tickle; J D Sargent; M A Dalton; M L Beach; T F Heatherton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference.

Authors:  L Biener; M Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The relationship between exposure to alcohol advertising in stores, owning alcohol promotional items, and adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Shannon Q Hurtz; Lisa Henriksen; Yun Wang; Ellen C Feighery; Stephen P Fortmann
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.826

4.  Associations between tobacco marketing and use among urban youth in India.

Authors:  Monika Arora; K Srinath Reddy; Melissa H Stigler; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2008 May-Jun

5.  Assessing tobacco marketing receptivity among youth: integrating point of sale marketing, cigarette package branding and branded merchandise.

Authors:  Sandra Braun; Christy Kollath-Cattano; Inti Barrientos; Raúl Mejía; Paola Morello; James D Sargent; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Exposure to cigarette promotions and smoking uptake in adolescents: evidence of a dose-response relation.

Authors:  J D Sargent; M Dalton; M Beach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Comparing the effects of entertainment media and tobacco marketing on youth smoking.

Authors:  J D Sargent; J Gibson; T F Heatherton
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Comparing the effects of entertainment media and tobacco marketing on youth smoking in Germany.

Authors:  James D Sargent; Reiner Hanewinkel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Considerations related to vaping as a possible gateway into cigarette smoking: an analytical review.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Katharine J Coombs; Esther F Afolalu
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-10

Review 10.  The importance of psychology for shaping legal cannabis regulation.

Authors:  Jacob T Borodovsky; Michael J Sofis; Richard A Grucza; Alan J Budney
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.