Literature DB >> 10841852

Exposure to cigarette promotions and smoking uptake in adolescents: evidence of a dose-response relation.

J D Sargent1, M Dalton, M Beach.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a dose-response relation exists between the number of cigarette promotional items (CPIs) owned by an adolescent, and smoking behaviour. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Voluntary, self administered survey of 1265 sixth through to 12th grade students (ages 10-19 years), representing 79-95% of all students attending five rural New Hampshire and Vermont public (state funded) schools in October 1996. The association between the number of CPIs owned by students and smoking behaviour was examined using multivariate regression methods. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted odds of being a smoker (>/= 100 cigarettes lifetime) and, among never and experimental smokers, adjusted cumulative odds of having higher levels on a smoking uptake index given the number of CPIs owned.
RESULTS: One third of students owned a CPI (n = 406). Among owners, 211 owned one, 82 owned two, 57 owned three, 24 owned four, 23 owned five, and 7 students owned six CPIs. The number of CPIs owned by students was not associated with grade in school but was significantly higher in males, those with poorer school performance, those who perceived high prevalence of peer smoking, and those with higher exposure to peer and family smoking. The more items a student owned, the greater the chances of being a smoker. For example, smoking prevalence was 11.2% for those not owning a CPI, 41.5% for those owning two, 58.5% for those owning four, and 71.4% for those owning six CPIs. The dose-response relation remained after controlling for confounding; compared with those who did not own a CPI, the likelihood of being a smoker was significantly higher for those who owned one CPI, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7 to 4.1); OR was 3.4 (95% CI 1.9 to 5.9) for those owning two CPIs, and 8.4 (95% CI 5.0 to 14.2) for those owning three or more CPIs. After excluding smokers, there was a crude dose-response association between CPI ownership and higher rates of experimentation with cigarettes among sixth to ninth graders (ages 11-15 years) only (n = 543). After controlling for confounding influences, the dose-response relation remained, with the likelihood of being higher on the smoking uptake index rising with the number of CPIs owned: one CPI, adjusted cumulative OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.60); two CPIs, OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.2 to 5.1); and three or more CPIs, OR 4.8 (95% CI 1.9 to 12.2).
CONCLUSIONS: This study offers evidence of a dose-response relation between the number of CPIs owned by adolescents and higher likelihood of experimental and established smoking. The dose-response relation persists after controlling for confounding influences. These data provide further support of a causal relation between tobacco promotional campaigns and smoking behaviour among adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10841852      PMCID: PMC1748336          DOI: 10.1136/tc.9.2.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  10 in total

1.  Adolescent dress, Part II: A qualitative study of suburban high school students.

Authors:  J B Eicher; S Baizerman; J Michelman
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  1991

2.  Cigarette promotional items in public schools.

Authors:  J D Sargent; M A Dalton; M Beach; A Bernhardt; D Pullin; M Stevens
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1997-12

3.  Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior.

Authors:  C Schooler; E Feighery; J A Flora
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States.

Authors:  W S Choi; J P Pierce; E A Gilpin; A J Farkas; C C Berry
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking.

Authors:  J P Pierce; W S Choi; E A Gilpin; A J Farkas; C C Berry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Tobacco advertising and consumption: evidence of a causal relationship.

Authors:  J B Tye; K E Warner; S A Glantz
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.222

7.  Influence of education and advertising on the uptake of smoking by children.

Authors:  B K Armstrong; N H de Klerk; R E Shean; D A Dunn; P J Dolin
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1990-02-05       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Tobacco promotion and susceptibility to tobacco use among adolescents aged 12 through 17 years in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  D G Altman; D W Levine; R Coeytaux; J Slade; R Jaffe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Drug use prevalence in a rural school-age population: the New Hampshire survey.

Authors:  M Stevens; F Youells; F Whaley; S Linsey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Influence of tobacco marketing and exposure to smokers on adolescent susceptibility to smoking.

Authors:  N Evans; A Farkas; E Gilpin; C Berry; J P Pierce
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

  10 in total
  18 in total

1.  Adolescent smoking and exposure to tobacco marketing under a tobacco advertising ban: findings from 2 Norwegian national samples.

Authors:  Marc T Braverman; Leif Edvard Aarø
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The relationship between exposure to alcohol advertising in stores, owning alcohol promotional items, and adolescent alcohol use.

Authors:  Shannon Q Hurtz; Lisa Henriksen; Yun Wang; Ellen C Feighery; Stephen P Fortmann
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Associations between tobacco marketing and use among urban youth in India.

Authors:  Monika Arora; K Srinath Reddy; Melissa H Stigler; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2008 May-Jun

4.  Adolescent perceptions of drug advertising come under review.

Authors:  Arielle Duhaime-Ross
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998.

Authors:  Louise Ann Rohrbach; Beth Howard-Pitney; Jennifer B Unger; Clyde W Dent; Kim Ammann Howard; Tess Boley Cruz; Kurt M Ribisl; Gregory J Norman; Howard Fishbein; C Anderson Johnson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Tobacco Marketing Receptivity and Other Tobacco Product Use Among Young Adult Bar Patrons.

Authors:  Johannes Thrul; Nadra E Lisha; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 5.012

7.  Engagement With Online Tobacco Marketing and Associations With Tobacco Product Use Among U.S. Youth.

Authors:  Samir Soneji; John P Pierce; Kelvin Choi; David B Portnoy; Katherine A Margolis; Cassandra A Stanton; Rhonda J Moore; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Charles Carusi; Andrew Hyland; James Sargent
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Corporate externalities: a challenge to the further success of prevention science.

Authors:  Anthony Biglan
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2011-03

9.  Adolescent Smoking Susceptibility in the Current Tobacco Context: 2014-2016.

Authors:  Olusegun Owotomo; Julie Maslowsky
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2018-05-01

10.  Tobacco industry targeting youth in Argentina.

Authors:  S Braun; R Mejia; P M Ling; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.