Literature DB >> 9411024

A horse race between independent processes: evidence for a phantom point of no return in preparation of a speeded motor response.

T McGarry1, I M Franks.   

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) data show that a speeded elbow extension response can be interrupted at any time after its execution. Submaximal, or partial, EMG data are also observed in some cases, from which 2 alternatives were considered. The partial response might in fact be interrupted early in response production or, alternately, it might arise from stopping processes that incompletely suppress the response production processes prior to their execution. An interrupted response is easily accounted for by a horse race between independent response production and stopping processes, whereas a partial response can only be reconciled if leakage between the two processes is allowed for. If the distinction between an interrupted and a partial response is correct, then the data yielded evidence for a phantom point of no return that locates late in the premotor component of the response and, thus, prior to the onset of EMG activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9411024     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.5.1533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Impaired inhibition of a pre-planned response in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A common control signal and a ballistic stage can explain the control of coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Atul Gopal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The point of no return in planar hand movements: an indication of the existence of high level motion primitives.

Authors:  Ronen Sosnik; Moshe Shemesh; Moshe Abeles
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  Novel measures of response performance and inhibition in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Paul Hommersen; Charlotte Johnston; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2008-11

9.  Functional distinction between visuomovement and movement neurons in macaque frontal eye field during saccade countermanding.

Authors:  Supriya Ray; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.