Literature DB >> 10075930

A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos.

A Carr1, M D Biggin.   

Abstract

Little is known about the range of DNA sequences bound by transcription factors in vivo. Using a sensitive UV cross-linking technique, we show that three classes of homeoprotein bind at significant levels to the majority of genes in Drosophila embryos. The three classes bind with specificities different from each other; however, their levels of binding on any single DNA fragment differ by no more than 5- to 10-fold. On actively transcribed genes, there is a good correlation between the in vivo DNA-binding specificity of each class and its in vitro DNA-binding specificity. In contrast, no such correlation is seen on inactive or weakly transcribed genes. These genes are bound poorly in vivo, even though they contain many high affinity homeoprotein-binding sites. Based on these results, we suggest how the in vivo pattern of homeoprotein DNA binding is determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10075930      PMCID: PMC1171247          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/18.6.1598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  45 in total

1.  Identification of an amino acid-base contact in the GCN4-DNA complex by bromouracil-mediated photocrosslinking.

Authors:  E E Blatter; Y W Ebright; R H Ebright
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Compilation of vertebrate-encoded transcription factors.

Authors:  S Faisst; S Meyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Transcription factor access to chromatin.

Authors:  M Beato; K Eisfeld
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins.

Authors:  J Treisman; P Gönczy; M Vashishtha; E Harris; C Desplan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Zeste-mediated activation by an enhancer is independent of cooperative DNA binding in vivo.

Authors:  J D Laney; M D Biggin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila.

Authors:  T Hoey; M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cooperative dimerization of paired class homeo domains on DNA.

Authors:  D Wilson; G Sheng; T Lecuit; N Dostatni; C Desplan
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Synergy between the hunchback and bicoid morphogens is required for anterior patterning in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Simpson-Brose; J Treisman; C Desplan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-09-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Eve and ftz regulate a wide array of genes in blastoderm embryos: the selector homeoproteins directly or indirectly regulate most genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Z Liang; M D Biggin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  Structure of the even-skipped homeodomain complexed to AT-rich DNA: new perspectives on homeodomain specificity.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; A K Aggarwal
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  33 in total

1.  Chip interacts with diverse homeodomain proteins and potentiates bicoid activity in vivo.

Authors:  E Torigoi; I M Bennani-Baiti; C Rosen; K Gonzalez; P Morcillo; M Ptashne; D Dorsett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Target selectivity of bicoid is dependent on nonconsensus site recognition and protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  C Zhao; V Dave; F Yang; T Scarborough; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Accessibility of transcriptionally inactive genes is specifically reduced at homeoprotein-DNA binding sites in Drosophila.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Selective interactions of human kin17 and RPA proteins with chromatin and the nuclear matrix in a DNA damage- and cell cycle-regulated manner.

Authors:  Laurent Miccoli; Denis S F Biard; Isabelle Frouin; Francis Harper; Giovanni Maga; Jaime F Angulo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Systematic characterization of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Zhi Xie; Shaohui Hu; Jiang Qian; Seth Blackshaw; Heng Zhu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Gwenael Badis; Andrew R Gehrke; Shaheynoor Talukder; Anthony A Philippakis; Lourdes Peña-Castillo; Trevis M Alleyne; Sanie Mnaimneh; Olga B Botvinnik; Esther T Chan; Faiqua Khalid; Wen Zhang; Daniel Newburger; Savina A Jaeger; Quaid D Morris; Martha L Bulyk; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Epigenetic priming of enhancers predicts developmental competence of hESC-derived endodermal lineage intermediates.

Authors:  Allen Wang; Feng Yue; Yan Li; Ruiyu Xie; Thomas Harper; Nisha A Patel; Kayla Muth; Jeffrey Palmer; Yunjiang Qiu; Jinzhao Wang; Dieter K Lam; Jeffrey C Raum; Doris A Stoffers; Bing Ren; Maike Sander
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 8.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control.

Authors:  François Spitz; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Insulation of enhancer-promoter communication by a gypsy transposon insert in the Drosophila cut gene: cooperation between suppressor of hairy-wing and modifier of mdg4 proteins.

Authors:  M Gause; P Morcillo; D Dorsett
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Developmental roles of 21 Drosophila transcription factors are determined by quantitative differences in binding to an overlapping set of thousands of genomic regions.

Authors:  Stewart MacArthur; Xiao-Yong Li; Jingyi Li; James B Brown; Hou Cheng Chu; Lucy Zeng; Brandi P Grondona; Aaron Hechmer; Lisa Simirenko; Soile V E Keränen; David W Knowles; Mark Stapleton; Peter Bickel; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.