Literature DB >> 9409606

Outcome of pouch-related complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

M T Dayton1, K P Larsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Creation of a small intestinal reservoir after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) results in an improved quality of life because of significantly diminished stool frequency. However, a number of complications associated with the pouch may jeopardize these sphincter-sparing procedures and occasionally result in permanent ileostomy. This study was conducted to assess the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcome of pouch-related complications after IPAA.
METHODS: Data on all patients undergoing IPAA with a J pouch between 1983 and Spring 1997 were prospectively gathered. Patients with pouch-specific complications were identified, and both inpatient and outpatient records analyzed in detail. When necessary, telephone contact was made to update functional data. Other parameters evaluated included age, gender, diagnosis, medication history, diagnostic modalities, laboratory values, time course, management strategies, reoperative procedures, and final results.
RESULTS: Some 510 IPAA procedures were performed between 1983 and Spring 1997; 87% of patients had inflammatory bowel disease. Operative mortality was 0%. In the entire series, 27 (5.3%) had complications related to the J pouch. Of those, 22 (81%) had ulcerative colitis and were on a mean dose of 32 mg/day of prednisone. Computed tomography scan made the diagnosis in 18 (67%) and the mean white blood cell count on admission was 14,400. In 11 (41%), the complications occurred after IPAA whereas in the other 16 (59%) it occurred after ileostomy closure. In 5 (19%), the complication resolved with intravenous antibiotics and percutaneous drainage, and 22 (81%) required reoperation. Proximal (11, or 41%) and distal (8, or 30%) pouch leaks or cuff abscesses were the most common complication and accounted for 19 (70%) of the complications observed. In this series, 3 patients (11%) had complications severe enough to warrant J pouch excision, and 1 patient had a permanent ileostomy without excision. Overall pouch excision/ failure in this series was 0.78%.
CONCLUSION: Complications involving the J pouch are a seemingly unavoidable part of sphincter-sparing surgery for colonic mucosal diseases. However, if therapy is timely, aggressive, and judicious for these complex patients, pouch loss should be uncommon and long-term results acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9409606     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

1.  Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; J Bustorff-Silva
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Surgical site infection following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease in patients with clean-contaminated wounds.

Authors:  Motoi Uchino; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Toshie Tsuchida; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Naohiro Tomita; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Long-term outcome 10 years or more after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Christine Leowardi; Ulf Hinz; Mirjam Tariverdian; Peter Kienle; Christian Herfarth; Alexis Ulrich; Martina Kadmon
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Risk factors for ileoanal J pouch-related septic complications in ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Udo A Heuschen; Ulf Hinz; Erik H Allemeyer; Frank Autschbach; Josef Stern; Matthias Lucas; Christian Herfarth; Gundi Heuschen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA): functional outcome after postoperative pelvic sepsis. A prospective study of 100 patients.

Authors:  Helena Hallberg; Dagny Ståhlberg; Jan-Erik Akerlund
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Assessments of anal canal sensitivity in patients with soiling 5 years or more after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Ryouichi Tomita; Seigo Igarashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Authors:  Rowena L Ramirez; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

9.  Does an ileoanal pouch offer a better quality of life than a permanent ileostomy for patients with ulcerative colitis?

Authors:  John Camilleri-Brennan; Alexander Munro; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis.

Authors:  H-P Bruch; O Schwandner; S Farke; J Nolde
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.