Literature DB >> 9408672

Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand.

B Ellis1, A Bruton, J R Goddard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the inter- and intra-rater reliability of goniometry and wire tracing in the assessment of finger joint angles: metacarpo-phalangeal (MCPJ), proximal (PIPJ) and distal interphalangeal joints (DIPJ).
DESIGN: Twenty occupational therapists and 20 physiotherapists with a range of clinical experience were recruited from nine different centres. Using a masked goniometer and wire tracing they carried out repeated assessments of the MCPJ, PIPJ and DIPJ of a normal subject fixed in two different positions.
RESULTS: The two assessment methods did not produce comparable angle measurements. Goniometry showed greater inter- and intra-rater reliability than wire tracing. Regardless of the assessment tool, the repeatability coefficient indicated that DIPJ measurement was less reliable than the other joints. Clinical and specialist experience did not affect reliability.
CONCLUSION: Although both goniometry and wire tracing show limitations as reliable assessment tools, it is recommended that where possible goniometry should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9408672     DOI: 10.1177/026921559701100408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  11 in total

1.  [The deepithelialized cross-finger flap: a good method for covering large dorsal finger defects].

Authors:  J Dabernig; B Shilov; O Schumacher; A J Turner; N Stirn; W Dabernig; C Lenz; J Schaff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Comparative analysis of photograph-based clinical goniometry to standard techniques.

Authors:  Jared A Crasto; Arash J Sayari; Robert R-L Gray; Morad Askari
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-06

3.  Viability of Hand and Wrist Photogoniometry.

Authors:  Clifton G Meals; Rebecca J Saunders; Sameer Desale; Kenneth R Means
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-04-09

4.  Is diagrammatic goniometry feasible for finger ROM evaluation and self-evaluation?

Authors:  Valdas Macionis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Range of Motion Measurements of the Fingers Via Smartphone Photography.

Authors:  John Z Zhao; Philip E Blazar; Ariana N Mora; Brandon E Earp
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-28

Review 6.  Complex hand dexterity: a review of biomechanical methods for measuring musical performance.

Authors:  Cheryl D Metcalf; Thomas A Irvine; Jennifer L Sims; Yu L Wang; Alvin W Y Su; David O Norris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-12

7.  Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Reissner; Gabriella Fischer; Renate List; William R Taylor; Pietro Giovanoli; Maurizio Calcagni
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Reliability and validity of lower limb joint range of motion measurements using a smartphone.

Authors:  Yousuke Miyachi; Morihiro Ito; Kunihiro Furuta; Rua Ban; Shuntaro Hanamura; Mitsuhiro Kamiya
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.131

9.  Reliability of the standard goniometry and diagrammatic recording of finger joint angles: a comparative study with healthy subjects and non-professional raters.

Authors:  Valdas Macionis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Validation of a smartphone application and wearable sensor for measurements of wrist motions.

Authors:  Fredrik Engstrand; Erik Tesselaar; Rickard Gestblom; Simon Farnebo
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2021-04-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.