Literature DB >> 9405658

The restriction-modification genes of Escherichia coli K-12 may not be selfish: they do not resist loss and are readily replaced by alleles conferring different specificities.

M O'Neill1, A Chen, N E Murray.   

Abstract

Type II restriction and modification (R-M) genes have been described as selfish because they have been shown to impose selection for the maintenance of the plasmid that encodes them. In our experiments, the type I R-M system EcoKI does not behave in the same way. The genes specifying EcoKI are, however, normally residents of the chromosome and therefore our analyses were extended to monitor the deletion of chromosomal genes rather than loss of plasmid vector. If EcoKI were to behave in the same way as the plasmid-encoded type II R-M systems, the loss of the relevant chromosomal genes by mutation or recombination should lead to cell death because the cell would become deficient in modification enzyme and the bacterial chromosome would be vulnerable to the restriction endonuclease. Our data contradict this prediction; they reveal that functional type I R-M genes in the chromosome are readily replaced by mutant alleles and by alleles encoding a type I R-M system of different specificity. The acquisition of allelic genes conferring a new sequence specificity, but not the loss of the resident genes, is dependent on the product of an unlinked gene, one predicted [Prakash-Cheng, A., Chung, S. S. & Ryu, J. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 241, 491-496] to be relevant to control of expression of the genes that encode EcoKI. Our evidence suggests that not all R-M systems are evolving as "selfish" units; rather, the diversity and distribution of the family of type I enzymes we have investigated require an alternative selective pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9405658      PMCID: PMC25066          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  J F Tomb; O White; A R Kerlavage; R A Clayton; G G Sutton; R D Fleischmann; K A Ketchum; H P Klenk; S Gill; B A Dougherty; K Nelson; J Quackenbush; L Zhou; E F Kirkness; S Peterson; B Loftus; D Richardson; R Dodson; H G Khalak; A Glodek; K McKenney; L M Fitzegerald; N Lee; M D Adams; E K Hickey; D E Berg; J D Gocayne; T R Utterback; J D Peterson; J M Kelley; M D Cotton; J M Weidman; C Fujii; C Bowman; L Watthey; E Wallin; W S Hayes; M Borodovsky; P D Karp; H O Smith; C M Fraser; J C Venter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Regulation of the activity of the type IC EcoR124I restriction enzyme.

Authors:  E M Kulik; T A Bickle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-12-20       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The in vitro assembly of the EcoKI type I DNA restriction/modification enzyme and its in vivo implications.

Authors:  D T Dryden; L P Cooper; P H Thorpe; O Byron
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-02-04       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants.

Authors:  C Rayssiguier; D S Thaler; M Radman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Host specificity of DNA produced by Escherichia coli: bacterial mutations affecting the restriction and modification of DNA.

Authors:  W B Wood
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Selfish behavior of restriction-modification systems.

Authors:  T Naito; K Kusano; I Kobayashi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Programmed cell death in bacterial populations.

Authors:  M B Yarmolinsky
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The effect of DnaA protein levels and the rate of initiation at oriC on transcription originating in the ftsQ and ftsA genes: in vivo experiments.

Authors:  M Masters; T Paterson; A G Popplewell; T Owen-Hughes; J H Pringle; K J Begg
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1989-04

9.  Restriction alleviation and modification enhancement by the Rac prophage of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  G King; N E Murray
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Distribution and diversity of hsd genes in Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria.

Authors:  A S Daniel; F V Fuller-Pace; D M Legge; N E Murray
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  15 in total

1.  Regulation of endonuclease activity by proteolysis prevents breakage of unmodified bacterial chromosomes by type I restriction enzymes.

Authors:  S Makovets; V A Doronina; N E Murray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cellular responses to postsegregational killing by restriction-modification genes.

Authors:  N Handa; A Ichige; K Kusano; I Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle).

Authors:  N E Murray
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Behavior of restriction-modification systems as selfish mobile elements and their impact on genome evolution.

Authors:  I Kobayashi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Nucleoside triphosphate-dependent restriction enzymes.

Authors:  D T Dryden; N E Murray; D N Rao
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Maintenance forced by a restriction-modification system can be modulated by a region in its modification enzyme not essential for methyltransferase activity.

Authors:  Satona Ohno; Naofumi Handa; Miki Watanabe-Matsui; Noriko Takahashi; Ichizo Kobayashi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A family of phase-variable restriction enzymes with differing specificities generated by high-frequency gene rearrangements.

Authors:  K Dybvig; R Sitaraman; C T French
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The EcoKI type I restriction-modification system in Escherichia coli affects but is not an absolute barrier for conjugation.

Authors:  Louise Roer; Frank M Aarestrup; Henrik Hasman
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Diverse functions of restriction-modification systems in addition to cellular defense.

Authors:  Kommireddy Vasu; Valakunja Nagaraja
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises.

Authors:  Wil A M Loenen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.