Literature DB >> 9399447

Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiographic and clinical results.

S E Emery1, J R Fisher, H H Bohlman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study of 16 patients who underwent the modified Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at three operative levels.
OBJECTIVES: To provide long-term follow-up data on the surgical success and patient outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomies and fusions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The success of arthrodesis for anterior cervical fusion depends on several factors, including the number of surgical levels. To the authors' knowledge, there are no long-term follow-up reports to describe the arthrodesis rate and outcome for patients having specifically three-level discectomy and fusion procedures.
METHODS: Sixteen patients, with an average age of 59 years, were followed for an average of 37 months. All had an anterior discectomy, burring of the endplates, and placement of an autogenous tricortical iliac crest graft at three levels. All patients had follow-up office visits with examinations and radiographs. Radiographic union, postoperative pain relief, and neurologic recovery were evaluated.
RESULTS: Only 9 (56%) of the 16 patients went on to achieve solid arthrodesis at all three levels. Of the seven patients with pseudarthrosis, two had severe pain and required revision; two had moderate pain and three no pain. Of the nine with the solid fusion, three had mild pain and six no pain, a statistically significant difference in comparing the two outcomes (P < 0.01). All patients with preoperative motor deficit recovered, but two patients in whom a pseudarthrosis had developed had limited improvement in function until the nonunion was surgically repaired.
CONCLUSIONS: A three-level modified Robinson cervical discectomy and fusion results in an unacceptably high rate of pseudarthrosis. Although not all pseudarthroses are painful, these data suggest that those with a successful fusion have a better outcome. It is recommended that these patients undergo additional or alternative measures to achieve arthrodesis consistently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9399447     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199711150-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanics of cervical laminoplasty: kinetic studies comparing different surgical techniques, temporal effects and the degree of level involvement.

Authors:  Christian M Puttlitz; Vedat Deviren; Jason A Smith; Frank S Kleinstueck; Quy N H Tran; Ralph W Thurlow; Pamela Eisele; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical laminoplasty construct stability: an experimental and finite element investigation.

Authors:  Srinivas C Tadepalli; Anup A Gandhi; Douglas C Fredericks; Nicole M Grosland; Joseph Smucker
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2011

4.  Does smoking influence fusion rates in posterior cervical arthrodesis with lateral mass instrumentation?

Authors:  Jason David Eubanks; Steven W Thorpe; Vinay K Cheruvu; Brett A Braly; James D Kang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Load sharing mechanism across graft-bone interface in static cervical locking plate fixation.

Authors:  In Ho Han; Sung Uk Kuh; Dong Kyu Chin; Byung Ho Jin; Yong Eun Cho; Keun Su Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-04-30

6.  Long-term follow-up of clinical and radiological outcome after cervical laminectomy.

Authors:  Sarita van Geest; Anouk M J de Vormer; Mark P Arts; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation.

Authors:  Mootaz Shousha; Ali Ezzati; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Sun-Jung Yoon; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

10.  Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elderly patients with wedge shaped tricortical autologous graft: A consecutive prospective series.

Authors:  Suk Ha Lee; Kwang Jun Oh; Kwang Su Yoon; Sung Tae Lee; Dilbans S Pandher
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.