Literature DB >> 9398397

A new concept of immune specificity emerges from a consideration of the self-nonself discrimination.

M Cohn1.   

Abstract

The necessity to make a Self(S)-NonSelf(NS) discrimination is the evolutionary selection pressure for specificity of the immune response. A new definition of paratopic specificity, which is heuristic and generalizable, can be derived from an understanding of this selection pressure. Specificity of the paratope is defined by a Specificity Constant, K, which is the probability that a functional change in recognition will be anti-Self. In an antigen-unselected population, K is the proportion of cells that are anti-Self. This definition is unique in that it is derived from the function upon which evolution selects, namely the effector output. This paper describes how the concept of a Specificity Constant was derived, how it is estimated, what it can be used to explain, and how it impacts on repertoire and effectiveness of response.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398397     DOI: 10.1006/cimm.1997.1212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Immunol        ISSN: 0008-8749            Impact factor:   4.868


  14 in total

1.  The immune system: a weapon of mass destruction invented by evolution to even the odds during the war of the DNAs.

Authors:  Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.988

2.  A computerized model for the self-non-self discrimination at the level of the T(h) (Th genesis). I. The origin of 'primer' effector T(h) cells.

Authors:  Melvin Cohn; Rodney E Langman; James J Mata
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.823

3.  A computerized model for the self-non-self discrimination at the level of the T(h) (Th genesis). II. The behavior of the system upon encounter with non-self antigens.

Authors:  Rodney E Langman; James J Mata; Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.823

Review 4.  A biological context for the self-nonself discrimination and the regulation of effector class by the immune system.

Authors:  Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 5.  A commentary on the Zinkernagel-Hengartner 'Credo 2004'.

Authors:  M Cohn
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 6.  The Tritope Model for restrictive recognition of antigen by T-cells II. Implications for ontogeny, evolution and physiology.

Authors:  Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 7.  An in depth analysis of the concept of "polyspecificity" assumed to characterize TCR/BCR recognition.

Authors:  Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.829

Review 8.  What roles do regulatory T cells play in the control of the adaptive immune response?

Authors:  Melvin Cohn
Journal:  Int Immunol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.823

Review 9.  A potential role for genome structure in the translation of mechanical force during immune cell development.

Authors:  Elsie Jacobson; Jo K Perry; David S Long; Mark H Vickers; Justin M O'Sullivan
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.197

10.  A rationalized set of default postulates that permit a coherent description of the immune system amenable to computer modeling.

Authors:  M Cohn
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.