Literature DB >> 9396979

Efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

D I Bernstein1, W F Schoenwetter, R A Nathan, W Storms, R Ahlbrandt, J Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: H1-receptor antagonists are effective for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In rare circumstances, some second-generation H1-receptor antagonists have been associated with prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc), thus increasing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Fexofendine HCl, the carboxylic acid metabolite of terfenadine, is a new second-generation antihistamine that is nonsedating and does not cause electrocardiographic effects.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of fexofenadine HCl in the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis and to characterize the dose-response relationship of fexofenadine HCl at dosages of 60, 120, and 240 mg bid.
METHODS: A multicenter, 14-day, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted with patients suffering from moderate to severe ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis who met symptom severity criteria after a 3-day placebo baseline period. Patients with minimal or very severe symptoms during the baseline period were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive fexofenadine HCl (60, 120, or 240 mg bid) or placebo at 12-hour dosing intervals (7:00 AM and 7:00 PM). The primary efficacy measure was patient-assessed 12-hour reflective total symptom score before the evening dose (trough).
RESULTS: Five hundred seventy patients completed the trial. Fexofenadine HCl at each dosage provided significant improvement in total symptom score (P < or = .003) and in all individual nasal symptoms compared with placebo. The frequency of adverse events was similar among fexofenadine HCl and placebo groups, with no dose-related trends. No sedative effects or electrocardiographic abnormalities, including prolongations in QTc were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Fexofenadine HCl is both effective and safe for the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Because there was no additional efficacy at higher dosages, 60 mg bid appears to be the optimal therapeutic dosage for these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9396979     DOI: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63041-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol        ISSN: 1081-1206            Impact factor:   6.347


  14 in total

1.  Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review.

Authors:  J W Slater; A D Zechnich; D G Haxby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Hay fever in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh; Sukhmeet Singh Panesar; Sarah Salvilla; Sangeeta Dhami
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2009-11-18

3.  Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antihistamines and montelukast in relieving allergic rhinitis nasal symptoms.

Authors:  Michael J Goodman; Mehul Jhaveri; Kim Saverno; Kellie Meyer; Brian Nightengale
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2008-10

4.  Fexofenadine: a review of its use in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Authors:  K Simpson; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  F E Simons; K J Simons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Selecting the optimal oral antihistamine for patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lehman; Michael S Blaiss
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Efficacy and tolerability of newer antihistamines in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Leonard Bielory; Kenneth W Lien; Steve Bigelsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of the effects of fexofenadine, loratadine and promethazine on cognitive and psychomotor function.

Authors:  I Hindmarch; Z Shamsi; N Stanley; D B Fairweather
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Evaluation of cytokines in nasal secretions after nasal antigen challenge: lack of influence of antihistamines.

Authors:  Greg W Bensch; Harold S Nelson; Larry C Borish
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.347

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.