Literature DB >> 10417497

A double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of the effects of fexofenadine, loratadine and promethazine on cognitive and psychomotor function.

I Hindmarch1, Z Shamsi, N Stanley, D B Fairweather.   

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether fexofenadine in a range of doses from 80 to 180 mg has any disruptive effects on aspects of psychomotor and cognitive function in comparison with placebo, loratadine and promethazine, an antihistamine known to produce psychomotor and cognitive impairment.
METHODS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers received fexofenadine 80 mg, 120 mg and 180 mg, loratadine 10 mg, promethazine 30 mg (as a positive internal control) and placebo in a six-way crossover, double-blind study. Following each dose, subjects were required to perform a series of tests of cognitive function and psychomotor performance at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h post dose. The test battery included critical flicker fusion (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT) and assessment of subjective sedation (LARS). Overall levels of activity were monitored by means of wrist mounted actigraphs throughout each of the 24 h experimental periods.
RESULTS: Fexofenadine at all doses tested was not statistically different from placebo in any of the tests used and loratadine did not cause any significant impairment of cognitive function. Significant impairments were found following promethazine. Promethazine caused a significant reduction in CFF threshold and this effect was evident up to 12 h post dose (P<0.05). There was a significant increase in recognition reaction time at 3 and 6 h post promethazine administration, and the drug caused a significant (P<0. 002) increase in the percentage of 'sleep-like' activity from actigraph records during the daytime.
CONCLUSIONS: Fexofenadine at doses up to 180 mg appears free from disruptive effects on aspects of psychomotor and cognitive function in a study where the psychometric assessments have been shown to be sensitive to impairment, as evidenced by the effects of the verum control promethazine 30 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10417497      PMCID: PMC2014291          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00993.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  20 in total

Review 1.  Comparative safety of H1 antihistamines.

Authors:  E O Meltzer
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1991-12

2.  A 1,4-benzodiazepine, temazepam (K 3917), its effect on some psychological parameters of sleep and behaviour.

Authors:  I Hindmarch
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1975-11

3.  Objective antihistamine side effects are mitigated by evening dosing of hydroxyzine.

Authors:  D W Goetz; J M Jacobson; S J Apaliski; D W Repperger; M E Martin
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1991-10

4.  Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time.

Authors:  D J Mullaney; D F Kripke; S Messin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 5.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

6.  The effects of zimeldine and amitriptyline on car driving and psychomotor performance.

Authors:  I Hindmarch; Z Subhan; M J Stoker
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl       Date:  1983

Review 7.  Nonsedating histamine H1-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  K V Mann; J P Crowe; K J Tietze
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1989-05

8.  The effects of clobazam and lorazepam on aspects of psychomotor performance and car handling ability.

Authors:  I Hindmarch; A C Gudgeon
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Acute and subacute actions on human performance and interactions with diazepam of temelastine (SK&F93944) and diphenhydramine.

Authors:  M J Mattila; M Mattila; K Konno
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Comparative effects of loratadine and terfenadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Authors:  S Belaich; G Bruttmann; H DeGreef; J M Lachapelle; E Paul; P Pedrali; D Tennstedt
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1990-02
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  The economic burden of allergic rhinitis: a critical evaluation of the literature.

Authors:  Shelby D Reed; Todd A Lee; Douglas C McCrory
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Fexofenadine: a review of its use in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria.

Authors:  K Simpson; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Authors:  Larry K Golightly; Leon S Greos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Selecting the optimal oral antihistamine for patients with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lehman; Michael S Blaiss
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of elderly patients suffering from organic brain disease (organic brain syndrome): results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Dieter Naber; Andrew Greenspan; Andreas Schreiner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Impact of allergic rhinitis treatment on quality of life.

Authors:  A Tripathi; R Patterson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Lack of effect of single and repeated doses of levocetirizine, a new antihistamine drug, on cognitive and psychomotor functions in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J M Gandon; H Allain
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Medications influencing central cholinergic neurotransmission affect saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Preshanta Naicker; Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie; Gary D Grant; Justin J Kavanagh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Brain histamine H1 receptor occupancy of orally administered antihistamines, bepotastine and diphenhydramine, measured by PET with 11C-doxepin.

Authors:  Manabu Tashiro; Xudong Duan; Motohisa Kato; Masayasu Miyake; Shoichi Watanuki; Yoichi Ishikawa; Yoshihito Funaki; Ren Iwata; Masatoshi Itoh; Kazuhiko Yanai
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.