Literature DB >> 9396041

Stage I and stage II infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast analyzed for chromosome 8 copy number using fluorescent in situ hybridization.

H F Mark1, W Taylor, A Afify, D Riera, M Rausch, A Huth, Y Gray, K Santoro, K I Bland.   

Abstract

We previously reported the results of 30 informative samples (from a total of 34 specimens gathered) of archival breast cancer tissue, including infiltrating ductal carcinoma (NOS), ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma, papillary carcinoma and benign lesions of the breast. The study was conducted using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and a chromosome 8 alpha-satellite probe. Subsequently, a total of 34 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast (NOS, 17 cases stage I and 17 cases stage II) were studied, again using interphase cytogenetics. The aim of the present study is to confirm and extend the results of our initial study of stage I and stage II disease. Towards this end, 36 additional specimens of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissue have been analyzed cytogenetically under blinded conditions for the frequency of abnormal chromosome 8 copy numbers using FISH and the previously described protocol optimized for our laboratory. Of these, 18 were stage I and 18 were stage II. The frequency of trisomy 8 among stage I tumors was found to be 28% (5 out of 18). The frequency of trisomy 8 among stage II tumors was found to be 61% (11 out of 18). These results, while less striking, are consistent with those reported in our initial study of stage I and stage II disease, where the frequencies of trisomy 8 among stage I and stage II tumors were 24% (4 out of 17) and 82% (14 out of 17). These results not only establish that chromosome 8 trisomy is a recurrent finding in breast cancer, but also confirm that a higher frequency of trisomy 8 was observed with a higher clinical stage (stage II) than with a lower stage (stage I). It will be of interest to extend the findings in stage I and stage II breast cancer to other stages as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9396041     DOI: 10.1159/000164121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathobiology        ISSN: 1015-2008            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  Monosomy of chromosome 8 could be considered as a primary preneoplastic event in breast cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Fabiola A García Parra-Pérez; Angel Zavala-Pompa; Javier Pacheco-Calleros; Elva I Cortés-Gutiérrez; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Sandra Lara-Miranda; Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Prognostic value of chromosome 1 and 8 copy number in invasive ductal breast carcinoma among Iranian women: an interphase FISH analysis.

Authors:  Farkhondeh Behjati; Morteza Atri; Hossein Najmabadi; Keramat Nouri; Mahdi Zamani; Parvin Mehdipour
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Chromosome 8 numerical aberrations in stage II invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation with patient outcome and poor prognosis.

Authors:  Yutaka Tagawa; Toru Yasutake; Yasushi Ikuta; Tadayuki Oka; Ryusuke Terada
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Cytogenetic and cDNA microarray expression analysis of MCF10 human breast cancer progression cell lines.

Authors:  Narasimharao V Marella; Kishore S Malyavantham; Jianmin Wang; Sei-ichi Matsui; Ping Liang; Ronald Berezney
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Multicolour-banding fluorescence in situ hybridisation (mbanding-FISH) to identify recurrent chromosomal alterations in breast tumour cell lines.

Authors:  A Letessier; M-J Mozziconacci; A Murati; J Juriens; J Adélaïde; D Birnbaum; M Chaffanet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.