Literature DB >> 16195769

Prognostic value of chromosome 1 and 8 copy number in invasive ductal breast carcinoma among Iranian women: an interphase FISH analysis.

Farkhondeh Behjati1, Morteza Atri, Hossein Najmabadi, Keramat Nouri, Mahdi Zamani, Parvin Mehdipour.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is amongst the leading causes of death in women worldwide and the most common cancer amongst Iranian women. Unfortunately, the current clinical and histological criteria can only help 60 percent of women with breast cancer in diagnosis and long-term treatment. Therefore, genetic markers both at single gene and chromosomal level can play an important role in improving the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer patients. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the role of chromosome 1 and 8 copy number assessed by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as prognostic parameters in 50 Iranian women, aged 35 to 64 years, with sporadic invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Chromosome 1 and 8 copy numbers were evaluated in relation to established clinicopathological parameters, the immunohistochemical markers ER, PR, P53 and cathepsin D, DNA index by flow cytometry, age and survival status of the patients. FISH using centromeric probes for chromosomes 1 and 8 was applied to interphase cell suspensions prepared from archived, Carnoyfixed tumor cells and selected paraffin-embedded tumor sections. Aneusomy for chromosomes 1 and 8 was present in all 50 patients to different levels. The total abnormality rate for chromosome 1 was 33.92 percent (4.24 percent monosomy and 29.68 percent polysomy), whereas for chromosome 8 this rate was 28.30 percent (6.48 percent monosomy and 21.82 percent polysomy). Statistically significant association (p<0.05) was demonstrated between monosomy 1 and patients' age below 50 years, and between monosomy 1 and poor survival, respectively. Disomy 8 was significantly associated with P53 expression. A borderline significant correlation was demonstrated between polysomy 8 and diploid DNA content, as well as between disomy 1 and disease-free status of the patients. Chromosome 1 and 8 copy numbers may be considered as useful prognostic markers in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16195769     DOI: 10.1007/bf02893392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  34 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of chromosomal CGH in human breast tumors associates copy number abnormalities with p53 status and patient survival.

Authors:  A N Jain; K Chin; A L Børresen-Dale; B K Erikstein; P Eynstein Lonning; R Kaaresen; J W Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures.

Authors:  S M Hsu; L Raine; H Fanger
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Detection of chromosome 1 aberrations by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7.

Authors:  I Léger; M Thomas; X Ronot; G Brugal
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.916

4.  Allelic loss at 1p34-36 predicts poor prognosis in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Y Utada; M Emi; M Yoshimoto; F Kasumi; F Akiyama; G Sakamoto; S Haga; T Kajiwara; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  P L Fitzgibbons; D L Page; D Weaver; A D Thor; D C Allred; G M Clark; S G Ruby; F O'Malley; J F Simpson; J L Connolly; D F Hayes; S B Edge; A Lichter; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Clinicopathological characteristics of breast carcinomas with allelic loss in the p73 region.

Authors:  G Dominguez; J Silva; J M Silva; J M Garcia; C Miralles; O Rodriguez; E Jareño; M Provencio; P España; F Bonilla
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Evaluation of numeric alterations of chromosomes 1 and 17 by in situ hybridization in invasive breast carcinoma with clinicopathologic parameters.

Authors:  Lydia Nakopoulou; Ioanna Giannopoulou; Dimitrios Trafalis; Hariklia Gakiopoulou; Antonios Keramopoulos; Panayiotis Davaris
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2002-03

8.  Detection of chromosomal aneusomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization for patients with nipple discharge.

Authors:  Daigo Yamamoto; Hideto Senzaki; Hiroyuki Nakagawa; Homa Okugawa; Hideki Gondo; Kanji Tanaka
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patterns of aneusomy for three chromosomes in individual cells from breast cancer tumors.

Authors:  Tanja Fehm; Larry Morrison; H Saboorian; Linda Hynan; Thomas Tucker; Jonathan Uhr
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Chromosome-specific aneusomy in carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  D L Persons; R A Robinson; P H Hsu; S A Seelig; T J Borell; L C Hartmann; R B Jenkins
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  9 in total

1.  Association of estrogen receptor-α A908G (K303R) mutation with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sakineh Abbasi; Mina Rasouli; Mehrnaz Nouri; Samira Kalbasi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-11-18

2.  Expression pattern of ATM and cyclin D1 in ductal carcinoma, normal adjacent and normal breast tissues of Iranian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Mahdieh Salimi; Hossein Mozdarani; Keivan Majidzadeh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Expression of MT2 receptor in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and its relationship with clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Nafiseh Nasri Nasrabadi; Ramin Ataee; Saeid Abediankenari; Mohammad Shokrzadeh; Mojtaba Najafi; Seyed Vahid Hoseini; Hamed Haghi Amin Jan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-03

4.  Application of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification in Determining the Copy Number Alterations of HER Gene Family Members in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohsen Soosanabadi; Reza Mirfakhraie; Lilit Atanesyan; Akbar Biglarian; Fatemeh Aghakhani Moghadam; Maryam Rahimi; Farkhondeh Behjati; Elaheh Keyhani
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04

5.  Mutation Screening of BRCA Genes in 10 Iranian Males with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Atieh Zorrieh Zahra; Sepideh Kadkhoda; Farkhondeh Behjati; Fatemeh Aghakhani Moghaddam; Azadeh Badiei; Fereidoon Sirati; Hossein Afshin Alavi; Morteza Atri; Ramesh Omranipour; Elahe Keyhani
Journal:  Int J Mol Cell Med       Date:  2016-05-09

6.  Influence of a 5-bp Indel Polymorphism at Promoter of the GAS5 lncRNA and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rafat Sharifi; S Shirin Shahangian; Zivar Salehi; Farhad Mashayekhi; Soheila Talesh Sasani; Laleh Mirzanezhad
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Investigation of the age trends in patients with breast cancer and different sizes of tumors in Breast Cancer Research Center of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2001-2010.

Authors:  Mehdi Tazhibi; Zahra Fazeli Dehkordi; Shadi Babazadeh; Maryam Tabatabaeian; Parisa Rezaei; Mehri Faghihi
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-05-05

8.  Response costs of mammography adherence: Iranian women's perceptions.

Authors:  Mahsa Khodayarian; Seyed Saied Mazloomi-Mahmoodabad; Minoor Lamyian; Mohammad Ali Morowatisharifabad; Hossein Tavangar
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2016-06-11

9.  Predictors of mammography based on Health Belief Model in Khorramabad women.

Authors:  Zahra Khazir; Mohammad Ali Morrowati Sharifabad; Ali Akbar Vaezi; Behnaz Enjezab; Hossein Fallahzadeh; Fatemeh Yari
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2019-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.